1 like 0 dislike
in General Factchecking by Master (5.4k points)

Did Randi Weingarten really "melt down"? From the article it sounds like she was yelling, but aside from a silent clip on the splash page there is no source for that either.

I fund this Oxford definiton of "melt down": collapse or break down disastrously.

Is there any indication this happened?

Links:

https://www.foxnews.com/

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/randi-weingarten-melts-down-student-debt-outside-scotus-not-fair

3 Answers

1 like 0 dislike
by Journeyman (2.9k points)
selected by
 
Best answer

This claim is false. It doesn't seem that she had a meltdown during her speech. According to Merriam-Webster, a meltdown is a rapid or disastrous decline or collapse, which is not what happened in the video clip you provided. She just seemed very passionate about the topic she was fighting for. In a different post from Fox News, it seems they labeled her speech as emotional rather than a meltdown, which is a bit more accurate than having a meltdown. I would not go as far as to say she was being emotional, but she seemed she was just trying to get through to her audience. Considering all the flack she got online, it seems that no one on the internet understands what a meltdown is either. Even if someone is ill-informed or using incorrect stances to defend her own, if they are speaking in the same tone she did, they would not be having a meltdown, they would just be passionate about their stance. Just because she belongs to certain political parties does not mean her words are more or less part of a meltdown.

https://www.foxnews.com/video/6321437618112

False
by Innovator (50.9k points)
0 0
You did a nice job with your write up and provided details like the definition of a meltdown and how Fox News miscatgorized a passionate speech for something else.
2 like 0 dislike
by Novice (960 points)

No it doesn't appear she melted down giving a speech. I linked a twitter video of the actual speech and it seems she was very passionate about it. Compared to that definition I would not say she was melting down.

https://twitter.com/CitizenFreePres/status/1630625715279527938?s=20

Exaggerated/ Misleading
by Master (5.4k points)
0 0
So why is this not false?
1 like 0 dislike
by Apprentice (1.1k points)
According to the definition you provided, Randi Weingarten did not have a "meltdown".

This is an exaggerated statement in regards to her being passionate about the speech she was giving at the time. Meltdown is being used an an exaggerated term.

Here is the speech, she is yelling in it, but it doesn't appear to be a meltdown: https://twitter.com/realDailyWire/status/1630972929499361280
Exaggerated/ Misleading

Community Rules


Be respectful.

There is bound to be disagreement on a site about misinformation. Assume best intentions on everyone's part.

If you are new to factchecking, take some time to learn about it. "How to Factcheck" has some resources for getting started. Even if you disagree with these materials, they'll help you understand the language of this community better.

News Detective is for uncovering misinformation and rumors. This is not a general interest question-answer site for things someone could Google.

Posting

The title is the "main claim" that you're trying to factcheck.

Example:
Factcheck This: Birds don't exist

If possible, LINK TO to the place you saw the claim.

Answering

LINK TO YOUR EVIDENCE or otherwise explain the source ("I called this person, I found it in this book, etc.")

But don't just drop a link. Give an explanation, copy and paste the relevant information, etc.

News Detective is not responsible for anything anyone posts on the platform.
...