4 like 0 dislike
in General Factchecking by Novice (530 points)

Earlier this summer, Travis Scott was cleared of criminal wrongdoing relating to the tragic crowd crush that occurred during his Astroworld Festival in November 2021. The incident resulted in the untimely deaths of 10 fans and left numerous others injured. Now, recent developments shed light on a potential reason behind Scott's decision to continue performing amidst the chaos.

report released by the Houston Police Department has brought to light a significant deal between Scott and tech giant Apple. The report outlines that Apple was set to pay Scott a staggering sum of $4.5 million under certain conditions, one of which was the completion of the concert.

1 Answer

1 like 0 dislike
by Novice (820 points)
The article does not specifically state that Travis Scott was paid millions of dollars to continue the show. Rather it alludes to a substantial amount of money that was paid, but still says that Travis Scott still may have and did know about what was going on in the audience.

https://houstonlanding.org/travis-scott-had-4-5-million-incentive-to-finish-astroworld-concert-police-report-says/ This article talks about how there was a contract and within it mandatory incentives that put 4.5 million dollars on the line. It is not confirmed however that Scott was aware of what was on here and for now has been confirmed.
by Journeyman (2.0k points)
0 0
This is a good fact-check. I appreciate the link and work you did to check the claim.
by Apprentice (1.6k points)
0 0
I appreciate your analysis of the article the claim referenced, as well as the additional article. However, I would recommend establishing a specific category in your fact check. Is the claim downright false, is it misleading, or simply exaggerated? I think some clarity would help organize your argument.
by Innovator (51.5k points)
0 0
How would you rate the claim? It's not clear. Also, don't forget to select a rating for each fact-check (true, false, misleading). Thanks!

Community Rules


• Be respectful
• Always list your sources and include links so readers can check them for themselves.
• Use primary sources when you can, and only go to credible secondary sources if necessary.
• Try to rely on more than one source, especially for big claims.
• Point out if sources you quote have interests that could affect how accurate their evidence is.
• Watch for bias in sources and let readers know if you find anything that might influence their perspective.
• Show all the important evidence, whether it supports or goes against the claim.
...