Question

Earth will get a second moon for two months

Comments

The title of this factcheck is slightly misleading in the sense that it states Earth will get a second moon. This sounds as though the Earth has created a second moon that will orbit us indefinitely. The article highlights that a small asteroid will briefly orbit Earth for about two months. There is a lack of information on this factcheck that would be helpful to readers.

---

By stating that the "Earth will get a second moon for two months" is majorly deceiving the actual point of the source they were writing about. By reading that claim, I assumed that the Earth was quite literally getting a second moon in which is not the case at all. Therefore, by adding more information to the claim as well as a different choice of wording, the claim would be much more understanding and the point would get across a lot more.

---

The title of this fact check is quite misleading. With the title it almost sounds like Earth gained a whole new moon, which it didn't because the actual point that the article was trying to make was that, the Earth was going to get an asteroid that looked as if it was a moon, to orbit the Earth for a couple months for a short period of time. The lack of information and evidence could potentially confuse new readers to the article.

---

This factcheck is slightly confusing, as the actual article elaborates on that the second moon would only last two months due to a small astroid. Even at that it's a mini moon, not a full moon. This article is very interesting it just needed more understanding about the content and what was actually going on. The argument than would have been more clear and concise. But good pick on the article, it was a fun fact to know!

---

CBS News makes an intriguing point about how an asteroid may begin to orbit the Earth, but the title of the article is misleading as the general public's view on the moon may not align with the reality of it being an asteroid. A better title could have included the fact that it is a horseshoe shaped asteroid instead of calling it another moon. Though the article does a good job on capturing people's attention with making the title an unusual event.

---

The title of this article creates a misconception that automatically creates skepticism because it has been taught that the Earth only has one moon. A credible source, CBS News, writes the article, however, it is not a normal scientific website such as NASA. The startling title does create intrigue and lures readers in.

---

I also found the title of this fact check to be really misleading. There is no information on how there will actually be two moons orbiting the earth but rather how there will be a little astroid that orbits around earth for an extended amount of time. I also think that the author could've titled this document something else because of the confusion that it has sparked.

---

**For fact-checks to be voted up or to be chosen as the best answer, please make sure to "answer" the claim rather than "comment" on it please. Thanks!

---

The fact check seems a little misleading the term mini moon is simply a device used to explain the orbit pattern to the average reader. Upon further reading the object doesn't meet all the criteria to be considered a moon.

---

Although the claim in this article title was not completely inaccurate, it was misleading and taken out of context. In the article "Earth will get a second mini-moon for 2 months" https://www.cbsnews.com/news/earth-second-mini-moon-2024/Links to an external site. , the author highlights the fact that an small asteroid will orbit our Earth for a short period of time. The fact that they changed the title to say that Earth would have a second moon is exaggerated and misleading. By reading the article "Planetary Defense at NASA" https://science.nasa.gov/planetary-defense/Links to an external site. , I was able to come to the. conclusion that the title was in fact taken out of context and highly exaggerated. They did this by changing the fact about it being an asteroid to a second moon which is false because they are not the same thing. Also after researching NASA's original article, I found that the asteroid will not be sucked into our gravitational orbit therefore not allowing for it to be considered a second moon.

---

I agree that it wasn't totally inaccurate but definitely could have been phrased better for clarity. Also, the NASA article is a great source and they explain why it would not affect Earth like a "real" moon and that it is an asteroid that will join our orbit temporarily.

---

The fact check seems slightly misleading. There is no information in the article about this "second moon", for a more accurate statement I would have suggested explaining the tiny astroid that will be floating around the moon rather than calling said astroid a "tiny moon".

---

According to phys.org, the new moon is actually a tiny asteroid. They say it is going to orbit the planet and stick around for a little less than two months. I understand how this could be perceived as a new moon, but I'm unsure if that's technically true.

---

I agree with your comment. The claim is too vague to even remotely agree with it. The moon as we know is earths only natural satellite, is it possible to get another yes, but it wont be similar to the moon we know. Scientists state that it will be an asteroid that will go into our orbit for a little period of time before leaving.

---

I think that this claim is not necessarily false, but misleading in a way. After my owmn research, I found that there will be a "mini moon" that will orbit for a month or two , but saying we are getting a second moon is quite misleading.

---

The main claim of this article is not completely untrue, although it is misleading. The asteroid 2024 PT5 was discovered by the Asteroid Terrestrial-impact Last Alert System, and will orbit the Earth during September and November and appear as if Earth has a second moon. However, further research via the ATLAS and NASA websites does not indicate that the asteroid will be a moon or have the same properties as Earth’s moon.

---

This is a great detailed response.

---

This source is missing critical information like, the object's size, details about its composition, information about its origin, an explanation of how it was discovered and some mention of the uncertainty in the calculations.

---

This is a very vague response following a misleading argument. The article talks about an object that will orbit the country for a little while but is nothing close to a moon.

---

Your fact check on the asteroid 2024 PT5 is mostly accurate, but it could be clearer. You mentioned that the asteroid will appear as if Earth has a second moon, which is misleading. According to NASA and ATLAS, 2024 PT5 will not be captured by Earth’s gravity and will remain about nine times farther away from Earth than the Moon. This means it won’t have the same properties or appearance as Earth’s moon. It would be helpful to clarify this distinction to avoid misconceptions. Additionally, while you did a good job referencing ATLAS and NASA, it would strengthen your argument to include specific data or quotes from these sources. For example, NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory provides detailed information about the asteroid’s orbit around the Sun, which supports your point that it won’t orbit Earth. Including this information would make your fact check more robust and informative. Overall, your fact check is well-researched, but adding these details would improve its clarity and accuracy.

Answer 1

This article, “Earth will get a second ‘mini moon’ for 2 months this year,” is false and misleading. The title is not only exaggerated, but wrong in regards to what a “mini moon” is. The article claims, “Earth will get a second moon for about two months this year when a small asteroid begins to orbit our planet.” Firstly, moons are different from asteroids in regards to their makeup. Secondly after researching, NASA made it evident that the asteroid will never be encapsulated in Earth’s gravity, thus not being considered a “mini moon,” but rather just a notable object. The object is neither a moon, or a “mini moon.” The title and content of the article makes readers believe otherwise. The article’s sources “Asteroid Terrestrial-impact Last Alert System” are correct in regards to what will occur when the asteroid is near Earth. The article explains how it will, “horseshoe orbit,” but exaggerate what it means to be a moon. The asteroid will not be visible and 9 times farther than the moon is from Earth, never making a complete orbit.

https://science.nasa.gov/planetary-defense/

https://atlas.fallingstar.com/

Comments

This is a fantastic fact-check. Not only do you check the original source cited and find a secondary source, but you took the time to have a well-rounded understanding of the information. You explained how this claim was misleading while providing information to make your explanation more understandable. It was very powerful how you cited your sources throughout your response, making every statement significantly more trustworthy.

---

I wholeheartedly agree; this is an excellent fact-check. You clearly articulate why the claim and article can be quite misleading, making it easy to mislead someone. You did an impressive job conducting your own research to clarify what the article truly conveyed—not a moon, but an asteroid. It was very effective that you included two sources with links at the end of your response, adding a professional touch. This is a superb fact-check! This is an outstanding fact-check. Not only did you verify the original source cited and find a secondary source, but you also took the time to gain a comprehensive understanding of the information. You effectively highlighted how this claim was deceptive while offering details that made your explanation clearer. The way you referenced your sources throughout your response was particularly impactful, enhancing the trustworthiness of every statement.

---

I like how you referenced scientific information rather than just other journalism websites. You efficiently debunk the "new moon" theory and identify that it is an asteroid that will orbit Earth, not a second moon.

---

I liked that you stated and researched the clear difference between a moon and an asteroid. Your answer was clear and concise, but thorough in thought.

---

I think that this a great fact check response, and I agree that the article was misleading. With that being said I think this factcheck is very adamant that the asteroid not be called a moon, and I think that it was great to include NASA's take on it being a notable object.

Answer 2

By stating "Earth will get a second moon" there is somewhat of a misleading idea that stems from this statement. It leads the reader to believe that a whole new planet is being created and orbiting Earth. I would suggest making your title claim more detailed to where it isn't misleading. For example "Earth will have a moon-like object orbiting for 2 months."

Comments

I agree with making the claim a lot more precise. Just stating that “Earth will get a second moon” seems to be set up so that people will have to dig deeper than just reading the article itself. Instead of making it seem like a new planet will begin to orbit the Earth, it should be stated that this is just an object that will overlap the Earth and has no relation to the solar system itself.

---

This is a strong callout the the word choice. I believe that you are on to something however, i would take this a step further and find information on the orbiting object so that it can be better identified and validated.

---

I agree with with the others and the answer too, there should definitely be a change to the title to make the claim less misleading because this could indeed potentially create a misunderstanding. it should also indeed state that it was a floating moon-like object orbiting the earth instead of a "2nd moon is orbiting the Earth"

---

This is poor word choice to catch the attention of the reader. If the article were trying to reflect the situation stated in the article correctly then it would state that it was a moon-like object that was orbiting around earth rather then claiming there is now a second moon.

---

While the title may be misleading, the article's first sentence clarifies that the new moon will not be permanent. the confusion here seems to be about the definition of a "moon" which is defined by NASA to be "Naturally-formed bodies that orbit planets are called moons, or planetary satellites" (https://science.nasa.gov/solar-system/moons/) therefore it is still accurate that the earth will have a second moon by definition, albeit for a limited amount of time as stated above. I disagree that the headline makes it seem that there will be a new planet forming and orbiting Earth as that is more associated with binary planets, not moons. adding the time it will orbit would make the article more clear to those that only read the headline.

---

I like how you provided a suggestion to the person making the claim, but it would be nice to have some information about the "mini moon" from a reliable source and why that statement is false, and learn what the "mini moon" is exactly.

---

Totally agree with you. Saying "Earth will get a second moon" makes it sound like some new planet or permanent thing, which isn't right. It would’ve been better if they just said something like what you suggested, makes it clear it’s just a temporary thing. That way, nobody gets the wrong idea, and it’s more accurate about what’s really happening.

Answer 3

This statement is definitely misleading and somewhat false. The so called "moon" is an asteroid named 2024 PT5, and it as been temporarily captured by Earth’s gravitational pull. The "mini moon" will be in orbit until around November 25th. I used the link provided below to help prove my answer.

https://www.kxan.com/news/earths-2nd-moon-has-arrived-what-you-need-to-know/#:~:text=(KTLA)%20%E2%80%93%20A%20second%20moon,an%20asteroid%20named%202024%20PT5.

Comments

The fact-checking answer is quick, simple, and easy to understand with more information available, and no criticism. Your source seems very useful and reputable.

---

Ava_Squire, your factcheck is simple yet effective in criticizing the original user’s claim. However, though your response is practically flawless, I’d suggest briefly summarizing the articles you provide links to or placing them in conversation somehow. While the links you have in your response provide a basis for further investigation into your claim, comparing the information presented in your supporting articles in your own words could vastly enhance the reliability and specificity of your response. My slight critique is more or less attributed to often decreased attention spans nowadays as a result of social media (https://www.apa.org/news/podcasts/speaking-of-psychology/attention-spans), so other users may be eager to see your answer all in one place rather than using the links. Well done and thank you for such a straightforward response!

---

This fact-check is very simple and easy to read. It gets right to the point and explains your claim very well.  Your source is good and seems reliable.

---

I like how your fact check is straight to the point and I appreciate the link to prove your statement. I also like how you explain that the "second moon" is only until November 25.

---

Your sources seem very credible and your evidence was straight forward. However, I would take it a step further by expanding on your ideas.

---

I appreciate how you pointed out right away it is an asteroid, not a "mini moon". It would also be good to add that the article you used stated the asteroid is "about the size of a bus". In comparison to the size of our planet, this is too small for us to even see. So it also is not even close to the size of what a "mini moon" would be. Shows the claim is false in two ways.

---

I love that you presented a quick and easy article that truly details how easily misleading this article is as the asteroid is not equivalent to a moon.

---

The source you provided seems to be very reliable and gives great explanation. This factcheck provides all the information needed to understand the claim at hand.

Answer 4

The claim that earth will get a second moon for two months is defiently misleading, the fact is that an small astroid named 2024 PT5, will be caught into earths grivational pull for 56 days. the misleading part is comparing a small astriod to earths moon, by calling it a "mini moon." The moon is composed of siliciate rock similar to earths crust, while asteriods can vary in composition depending on their location in the solar system, with some being mostly rocky, others metalllic.

https://homework.study.com/explanation/how-are-moons-and-asteroids-different.html#:~:text=Answer%20and%20Explanation%3A,and%20not%20around%20the%20Sun.

https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/2515-5172/ad781f

Comments

This fact check is quick, gets the point across affectively, and has evidence that an asteroid and moon are different . The sources seem reliable.

---

Read the sources, The articles posted for this claim have evidence of the difference between a moon and an asteroid and also have evidence for the object orbiting around the Earth. The fact check is effective and has evidence backing up their claim.

---

This fact check does a great job of summarizing what the actual 'second moon' is and managing to make it concise and straight to the point. The IOP.org source is a reliable, trustworthy source that you used to back up your claim. I agree that the term 'second moon' is misleading, and wrong.

Answer 5

While new matter will be entering the Earth's orbit, it's not a new moon. In actuality, it's an asteroid that will begin its revolutions around Earth on Sept. 29th and leave the orbit Nov. 25th. Researchers are calling it a mini-moon, but that's not what it really is, it's simply an asteroid that will look like a second moon. It's only temporary and will not remain in Earth's orbital path. "Asteroid 2024 PT5 belongs to a group called Arjuna asteroids, which have orbits similar to Earth's. Because it will come close to Earth at a slow speed, it won't make a full loop around Earth; instead, it will eventually return to orbit around the sun." 

I got this quote from the article Are we getting a second moon? Everything to know about Earth's mini moon by Tiffany Acosta,  updated sept. 20th, 2024

https://www.usatoday.com/story/entertainment/life/2024/09/20/earths-second-moon-2024-pt5-mini-moon/75308274007/ 

Comments

I enjoyed how you included specific details that prove your claim such as the specific dates and background information on thee asteroid itself.

---

Your fact-check was very readable and not wordy, which I enjoyed. You do a good job of knocking down this claim and provide plenty reasoning on why exactly it is not true. Not only did I learn that we are not going to be getting a second moon, this fact check helped me to understand what exactly will be happening, without getting too into the numbers. You also used a great and reliable source.

---

This fact check was easy to read and straight to the point. I enjoyed where you clearly explain why the article's title is misleading, and then proceed to explain why, as well as provide the factual and correct information included with the source. This answer better helped educate not only me, but others who come across an article like this

Answer 6

https://www.kxan.com/news/earths-2nd-moon-has-arrived-what-you-need-to-know/#:~:text=(KTLA)%20%E2%80%93%20A%20second%20moon,captured%20by%20Earth's%20gravitational%20pull.

Although a second moon sounds like a much cooler name this second object in our sky is actually an asteroid named 2024 PT5. It's labeled a "mini moon" by scientists who discovered it and it was published October 5th. However, apparently this type of behavior happens every few years and these mini moons only occur for a month or two at most.

Comments

I appreciate the source that you included and the fact that you added the actual name of the asteroid that has been called a "mini moon", but I wish that you had included some direct quotes from the article, for example “There’s no way for small telescopes to see this mini-moon. It’s far too small — about the size of a bus,” Dr. David Reitzel, an astronomical lecturer at Griffith Observatory, told Nexstar’s KTLA. “Only the world’s largest telescopes can detect it, or a very long exposure is required.” Which is a very cool piece of information about the size which debunks the belief of a second moon further.

Answer 7

Earth's new "second moon" is just an asteroid paying a visit. This asteroid from the Arjuna asteroid group will follow a horseshoe-shaped path around Earth from September 29 to November 25, 2024, before being pulled back into its heliocentric orbit. It's described as a "mini-moon," but even that is a stretch as it won't complete a full orbit of Earth once. These "mini-moon" events are rare but not impossible, with similar events happening in 1981, 2020, and 2022. After the asteroid departs our orbit in November, it is said to be expected to make a return in 2025 and 2055.

The source for this information is where Tatyana Woodall debriefs the mini moons' birth in our orbit using information from NASA and interviews with planetary specialists about the importance of studying asteroids.

https://www.nationalgeographic.com/science/article/second-mini-moon-asteroid#:~:text=Even%20calling%20the%20object%20a,make%20multiple%20circuits%20around%20it.

Answer 8

The initial headline can be extremely misleading. CBS is a very reliable source and while reliable this article is very misleading. Looking at the headline and through the article they structure it in a way that makes you believe we are actually getting a second moon. However it is just an asteroid that will orbit in earths gravitational pull. I used the link below to help fact check this article because while not necessarily incorrect definitely misleading. CBS also didn't interview anyone for the article just borrowed a quote from another publisher while NBC did take the time to interview Carlos de la Fuente Marcos, who co-authored a study about the asteroid.

https://www.nbcnews.com/science/space/mini-moon-asteroid-to-orbit-earth-temporarily-rcna172264 

Answer 9

This claim is not entirely wrong but is very misleading. According to the CBS News article provided, Earth will be getting what is referred to as a "mini-moon". An asteroid from the Arjua asteroid belt has started to orbit Earth. And when something orbits the Earth for a full revolution, it's considered a mini-moon. This will last from September 29th till November 25th which qualifies this asteroid as a mini moon. By no means the Earth will be getting a true second moon.

Comments

Nice work on your fact-check. Please include all source URLs (re: CBS) next time. Thanks! Also, it's best to include sources not included in the claim.

Answer 10

slightly mislead by the factcheck. it does not appear that the object that will orbit earth for two months is large enough to be considered a moon but instead just an asteroid that will be temporarily pulled into orbit. The "mini moon" moniker is likely a simplification to relate the story to the public, but it seems unnecessary.