0 like 0 dislike
in General Factchecking by Novice (550 points)
The UK Labor Party released an action plan that aims to prohibit sales of energy drinks with over 150 milligrams of caffeine per liter to kids under 16 year old. Many energy drinks such as Red Bull (111 mg in 12 fl. oz) and Monster (160 mg in 16 fl. oz.) are readily available in stores for kids to buy. Adults are advised to consume up to 400 mg of caffeine a day. However, children have different levels of dosage than adults due to their weight. So, daily amount of caffeine is reduced. Because of the spike in sales of energy drinks, more children are subject to health risks. In some cases, death has occurred due to energy drinks. How likely is it that restrictions like these will follow over to the United States?
by (100 points)
0 0
This is true. News sites such as BBC and the conversation both stated that the Labour Party said it would ban children under 16 from purchasing energy drinks in the UK if they win the election. According to https://medlineplus.gov/caffeine.html, caffeine can cause sleep disorders, such as insomnia, high blood pressure, an abnormal heartrate, migraines, and anxiety. Recognizing this, many people do not support American youth consuming energy drinks and seek to get them banned. The American Medical Association is currently supporting a ban on energy drinks for youth under 18, and researching child-resistant packaging. According to a review of 57 studies from BBC, energy drink consumption can harm the mental and physical health of youngsters.

8 Answers

0 like 0 dislike
by Newbie (480 points)
selected by
 
Best answer
The main claim of this article is that the U.K. wants to ban energy drinks for kids under 16. This a slight exaggeration they don't want to ban all energy drinks for kids under 16. they want to prohibit any drinks that contain over 150 milligrams per liter from being sold to them. The other claim is that many in the U.S. want to do the same this is a broad statement but it does have some truth. In the article, they don't give a source on the "many" that want the U.S. to also ban it. Though this statement is true there are states that are trying to create this law in their state. Specifically in Connecticut, they are trying to pass a law for there to be regulation around energy drinks.(https://www.cga.ct.gov/2024/fc/pdf/2024HB-05261-R000037-FC.PDF)
True
by Novice (530 points)
0 0
I like how you point out how misleading the claim is. And get staright the point to tell us the exact # of mg that is prohibited. Very simple, and traight the point, and factual. I like how You point out their vague use of the word "many" aswell.
0 like 0 dislike
by Newbie (320 points)

The NBC news article explained the UK’s want to ban energy drinks over 150ml for children under 16. Although, they are not the only ones. Legislators in the US want to start creating laws to ban energy drinks for adolescents under 16, with attention being drawn to Connecticut. According to the article, “Democratic State Rep. Liz Linehan has been working since 2019 to pass legislation in her state.” Although there is a desire to regulate energy drinks, they have been unsuccessful through the FDA. According to an article from the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, “Food and Drug Administration (FDA) does not currently regulate energy drinks in the same category as soda and food, emphasizing that the beverages contain inadequate or no specific warning labels about potential dangers to minors or vulnerable populations” (https://www.chop.edu/about/news-brief/researchers-childrens-hospital-philadelphia-advocate-energy-drink-regulation). Although there is a country-wide drive to regulate energy drinks, especially to those under 16, the National Drug Administration has no desire to regulate. The research from the Children's Hospital claims that “the United States remains the least regulated country and should take immediate steps to protect vulnerable populations.” Therefore, the claim that the US will soon regulate the purchase of energy drinks to its consumers is misleading because, although people support the notion, the government has yet to acknowledge how dangerous energy drinks can be to adolescents. 

Exaggerated/ Misleading
0 like 0 dislike
by Novice (840 points)
To Begin this factcheck makes claims about energy drink bans in the US however starts with information regarding the UK which creates a confusing narrative. In order to be completely transparent and truthful to the audience lets evaluate energy drink use in specifically US in order to answer the claim. As of currently there are zero federal regulations on energy drinks. However health advocates around the US have been filing formal complaints to restrict the sale of caffeinated drinks to children. According to a bill attempting to be passed in the state of Connecticut (https://www.cga.ct.gov/2024/fc/pdf/2024HB-05261-R000037-FC.PDF) Energy drinks are a significant health concern for growing children that can cause many negative health impacts. This bill states that there shall be a ban of all energy drink sales to people under the age of 16 in the state of Connecticut and the department of consumer protection will punish any sales that do not abide to this bill. In March of 2024 this bill has made it past the first round of decisions with a 13:6 Yay and Nay vote system on the floor of local Connecticut congress. This bill does show progress for certain states in the hope of banning energy drink sales to youth however the claim of Nation wide regulation is still a reach. Only 7 of the 50 states have commented on caffeine consumption and addressed possible regulations.
Exaggerated/ Misleading
0 like 0 dislike
by Newbie (320 points)

The claim of which the U.S is soon to follow the U.K with regulating energy drinks has been proven to be accurate as the article linked in the original by NBC News, is not only a trusted source itself but also went to provide quoted interviews and information as well as links to every single one of their sources that appear popular, trusted by many, and proved to be legit. One of the quoted articles matches the information NBC News released quoting, "Anyone looking to buy a soft drink with more than 150 mg of caffeine per liter — a limit targeting drinks like Monster and Red Bull — will need to present an ID". Not only is the information proven and available at ease, but it is also on a topic that anyone who is either drinking the energy drinks or in a younger generation surrounded by them at all times, is aware of the issue and can most likely agree to the true claim made. 

True
0 like 0 dislike
by Newbie (300 points)

The article that claims that “Energy drinks will soon be regulated in the US” could be inaccurate because as there have been discussions and proposals state wise “it has never been discussed or implemented as federally” (“Navigating the Buzz: Understanding FDA Energy Drink Regulations”). It is clear that energy drinks may have bad effects on people as pointed out in the article by mentioning the deceased 14 year old that took 2 energy drinks within 24, also these drinks are known to have links with serious cardiovascular and neurological problems but despite this there has not been national actions to regulate these drinks. “The FDA has not yet implemented age restrictions to purchase energy drinks” (Daily) but has put regulations to show the amount of milligrams of caffeine that the drink has and the ingredients it contains. Although there has been state wise discussions about age restriction on energy drinks this has not been a central theme to put federal regulations. On the other side the article talks about banning the sales to children under 16 in the UK but only to “beverages that exceed 150 mg per liter” (Arthur).

Exaggerated/ Misleading
0 like 0 dislike
by Newbie (300 points)
The claim in this statement is saying that children are unable to hold in their system a less dosage of caffeine, produced through energy drinks, rather than adults. The statements is true speaking that children have less weight to hold down the caffeine as well as they are still developing and do not need caffeine to become apart of their development. Within the article 'The U.K. may ban sales of energy drinks to kids under 16. Many want the U.S. to do the same' written by Elizabeth Chuck, it is stating that the UK has already started the start of a new change to making sure these energy drinks are not being distributed to the youth and the US will soon follow after that.
0 like 0 dislike
by Newbie (340 points)
The claim that the US is soon to start regulating energy drinks like the UK is true. The article states that the US wants to create a healthly generation and to do so they will create  regulations on caffeinated drinks for kids under 16. Although most of this claim is true, it is slightly exaggerated. It is true that the US will start regulating energy drinks, but they will not ban them all like the post might lead you to believe.
True
0 like 0 dislike
by Novice (600 points)
This claim is true. The initial claim of the article is that the United Kingdom wants to ban all energy drinks for kids under the age of 16. This is generally true and at the heart of what they're attempting to pass in the United Kingdom, however, what is happening is they're restricting the purchasing of drinks with more than 150 milliliters of caffeine to those 16 and older. That means drinks such as Coke, Pepsi, Dr. Pepper, etc. would all be unaffected by the restriction as their total caffeine values are much lower than the 150 milliliter limit. The claim "Energy drinks will soon be regulated in the U.S." is true, because of increasing support in the United States for regulation over potentially harmful substances, as well as previous attempts to pass legislation before there was as much support. With more and more studies providing evidence for the dangers of consuming energy drinks, pressure will increase on politicians to pass legislation protecting children from potentially harmful substances, as they have done in the past for substances like alcohol and tobacco.
True

Community Rules


Be respectful.

There is bound to be disagreement on a site about misinformation. Assume best intentions on everyone's part.

If you are new to factchecking, take some time to learn about it. "How to Factcheck" has some resources for getting started. Even if you disagree with these materials, they'll help you understand the language of this community better.

News Detective is for uncovering misinformation and rumors. This is not a general interest question-answer site for things someone could Google.

Posting

The title is the "main claim" that you're trying to factcheck.

Example:
Factcheck This: Birds don't exist

If possible, LINK TO to the place you saw the claim.

Answering

LINK TO YOUR EVIDENCE or otherwise explain the source ("I called this person, I found it in this book, etc.")

But don't just drop a link. Give an explanation, copy and paste the relevant information, etc.

News Detective is not responsible for anything anyone posts on the platform.
...