This concept is interesting to think about, but there is a lot wrong with this claim. Although the claim matches what the article is claiming, the article has a lot of things that could be improved, including some misinformation. They claim that there is "proof" blondes have more fun, but the article does not link the study or reference specific data that they are referring to when making this claim. The article says they surveyed 200 dyed blondes, but they should have considered natural blondes and explained how they have more fun than nonbleach blondes. The article includes a claim from Mark Sergeant, a researcher at Nottingham Trent University who allegedly conducted the study. He says that people's confidence elevates when coloring their hair and that they have specific mood or attitude changes. He makes this claim by referring to people who have dyed their hair, not blondes specifically, which is what the article claims. The end of the article states that "they plan on doing another study to find out the differences between natural blondes and bottle blondes," meaning they hadn't done any research involving natural blondes in an article about blondes having more fun. Overall, the article claims they have proof of how blondes have more fun, but they never cite any data or accurate information to support their claim with facts. The claim that blondes have more fun is subjective, and even with physical data leaning in favor of that claim, there is no concrete proof that blondes scientifically have more fun or a better quality of life than people with different hair colors.
