2 like 1 dislike

3 Answers

0 like 0 dislike
by Newbie (480 points)
selected by
 
Best answer

The statement that Dan Lanning "tipped off Tennessee about Nico Iamaleava" is simply a rumor. The article by GridIron Heroics is merely based on social media posts by mere fans. The article admits that there hasn't been a credible journalist to confirm the rumor but notes about the potential backlash Oregon could face if the rumors are proved to be true. Further evidence, however, could be provided about proof that Oregon and USC were in contact with Nico during the transfer window. But, even if this evidence is provided, an interest from a school and a player in a transfer window isn't enough proof on its own to prove that Dan Lanning made contact with Tennessee about Nico wanting a new NIL deal.

Here is a link showing why contact between Oregon and Nico during the transfer window makes no sense: https://www.si.com/college/oregon/football/nico-iamaleava-transfer-portal-oregon-ducks-football-dan-lanning-five-star-quarterback-dante-more-2025-season-nil

Here is a link showing Dan Lanning's response to the rumors:https://www.sportingnews.com/us/ncaa-football/news/oregons-dan-lanning-shuts-down-tennessees-nico-iamaleava-rumblings-loud-statement/d924d2633aaa43a8daa18b76 

Without a proper journalist to confirm the rumors, we must turn to logic. Due to the lack of plausibility of Oregon seeking a transfer quarterback and the potential harm Oregon would receive if Lanning made contact, there is no logic behind these rumors.

False
by Newbie (270 points)
0 0
Good response to the original statement. I like how you added Lanning's response which completely debunked the false claim being made.
by Newbie (200 points)
0 0
Great job linking to Lanning’s public denial, t’s always helpful to ground discussions in direct sources. I’m curious, though, about how much weight we should give those kinds of statements. Coaches often deny rumors even when there’s some truth to them, especially with sensitive issues like NIL deals. Maybe a helpful addition would be a look at how often these types of rumors have turned out to be true or false in the past. Are there other cases where a coach made a firm public denial and it turned out there was backchannel contact?
ago by Novice (500 points)
0 0
What I enjoy about this response is the idea of logic being used. This comes as you provide two different sources to prove the claim wrong. This allows for different perspectives to be used on the topic to prove it false, but also allows the sources to prove they are reliable and prove the claim wrong.
0 like 0 dislike
by Newbie (260 points)
As of right now, there are no statistical facts stating whether Dan Lanning tipped off Tennesee about Nick lamaleava leaving the college football program, all of the reports are just hearsay and rumors. Based on a few other sources, Lanning refuses to speak on the matter and would rather talk about the Ducks.

https://brobible.com/sports/article/dan-lanning-nico-iamaleava-tennessee-nil-snitch-tip-transfer/

https://www.oregonlive.com/ducks/2025/04/dan-lanning-declines-to-address-reported-contact-from-former-tennessee-quarterback-nico-iamaleava.html
Exaggerated/ Misleading
0 like 0 dislike
by Newbie (300 points)

For the source provided, right now it is a rumor that Dan Lanning (Oregon's Head Football Coach) told Josh Heupel (Tennessee's Head Football Coach) that his quarterback was interested in leaving the program. The only source of information that was linked to the article was a X/Twitter post (https://x.com/RenoTahoeDuck/status/1910800252002803984) of random person's account saying on some social website (like reddit) that Oregon called the University of Tennessee saying that they were interested in their quarterback. The problem with this is that it isn't a quality report or good source of evidence. Unless it's from a quality source, we can't trust this rumor just yet. 

Exaggerated/ Misleading

Community Rules


• Be respectful
• Always list your sources and include links so readers can check them for themselves.
• Use primary sources when you can, and only go to credible secondary sources if necessary.
• Try to rely on more than one source, especially for big claims.
• Point out if sources you quote have interests that could affect how accurate their evidence is.
• Watch for bias in sources and let readers know if you find anything that might influence their perspective.
• Show all the important evidence, whether it supports or goes against the claim.
...