0 like 0 dislike
ago in General Factchecking by (150 points)
edited ago by
The Pentagon has pushed for new policies about the information that journalists can report on related to the Department of Defense. According to the BBC one of the policies says that military personnel cannot share information without the approval of the DOD.

1 Answer

1 like 0 dislike
ago by Novice (880 points)
selected ago by

This claim is that the Pentagon has attempted to implement new policies about the information journalists will be allowed to report regarding the Department of Defense (Now the Department of War). It specifically mentions a claim that military personnel will not be able to present journalists with any information without prior approval from the Department of War. 

An article published by BBC, written by Brajesh Upadhyay

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cy0ygg06pgko

This article is linked in the original post. 

The article mentions the policy submitted and claims that it contains a “provision that military personnel need approval before sharing information with the media, even if it isn't classified.” 

An article published by Aljazeera, written by Aren Hale

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/10/16/us-media-return-pentagon-passes-giving-up-access-after-new-rules-kick-in

This article also mentions this document. It escalates it further than the BBC article and claims that reporters were given a deadline of Wednesday afternoon to sign a 21 page document. This document contains the rules to receive press credentials and access the Pentagon. This article presents quotes from the Pentagon Press association. These quotes claim that  “reporters would not sign onto a new media policy over its implicit threat of criminalising national security reporting and exposing those who sign it to potential prosecution.” Over 30 news outlets have declined to follow the new guidelines issued by the Department of War. 

An article published by Fox 21 News, written by David Bauder

https://www.fox21news.com/news/national/ap-journalists-turn-in-access-badges-exit-pentagon-rather-than-agree-to-new-reporting-rules/

Confirms that this is a legitimate policy being implemented by Pete Hegseth and that journalists have nearly unanimously refused to abide and have vacated the pentagon.

This claim is true, and the Pentagon has not only attempted to implement these policies, but they have successfully pushed the policies forward despite dissent from journalists and news outlets. Based on this Reuters article (https://www.reuters.com/business/media-telecom/us-news-outlets-reject-pentagon-press-access-policy-2025-10-14/), which was updated ten hours ago, the Pentagon has chosen to revise the policy. Despite revision, the Pentagon remains adamant that publishing information that may be sensitive is not entirely protected by the First Amendment. The Pentagon has directly stated that “The press's rights are not absolute.”

True
ago by Newbie (220 points)
0 0
I really liked how you included direct quotes from your sources and accurately summarized the main points. Also, the quantitative details, like the 21 page document and 30 news outlets, are helpful in understanding the dilemma. Something that confused me was the first source you used, Aljazeera, which I had never heard of. After some research I found that they are a very credible international news source. I think providing some brief background on your news sources could strengthen your argument. As someone who is interested in keeping up with this story as it develops, I appreciated how you found the most recent and truthful information through the Reuters article.

Community Rules


• Be respectful
• Always list your sources and include links so readers can check them for themselves.
• Use primary sources when you can, and only go to credible secondary sources if necessary.
• Try to rely on more than one source, especially for big claims.
• Point out if sources you quote have interests that could affect how accurate their evidence is.
• Watch for bias in sources and let readers know if you find anything that might influence their perspective.
• Show all the important evidence, whether it supports or goes against the claim.
...