0 like 0 dislike
in General Factchecking by Newbie (220 points)
The drone threats in the United states are increasing and the government is not keeping up with it. Senetor Tom Cotten expressed his concerns about how with so many drones nowadays flying over millitary bases, border lines , and public events, most agensies are held back from stopping them becuase of pervious outdated laws. Although most drone owners are just people enjoying free time some may be linked to criminal or terroristical groups which can raise the overall risk of attacks withen U.S. soil and illegal survalience. Recent data showed hundreds of drone related incidents have happened over millitary bases and lots more near the southern border. To add on, the government shutdown delayed key drone protection agencys which showed how unpreppared they were. Senetor Tom Cotten and many others argue that unless new laws are passed soon and with the ongoing issue with the lack of support needed to be ready

1 Answer

0 like 0 dislike
ago by Apprentice (1.2k points)
selected ago by

I felt this was mostly true with some caveats in a valid sense as the evidence fairly supports the basic claims but not every part is as strongly argued. CBS News and the opinions of U.S. government officials testified that unauthorized drone incidents have soared above military bases, at the southern border and near public events. Lawmakers like Senator Tom Cotton have criticized out-of-date legislation that robs agencies of anything they can do to counter those drones — despite the fact that data shows only about half of military bases have legal clearance for the interception or disablement of these vehicles. Those arguments seem to bolster the case that drone threats are on the rise and that government delays in implementing them because of inadequate regulations, outdated counter-drone policies and not enough approval for agencies to respond. But certain aspects of the statement tend to read as more about possible risk than evidence for it, and that’s why this is not entirely true. While officials say drones *could* be employed by terrorist groups or criminal groups, the reports offer no mention of any confirmed terrorist-directed drone strikes on U.S. soil as of yet. Instead, most threats might be with *the potential* of the attacks to manifest themselves in real life, instead of documented experiences. Lastly, while the government shutdown briefly paused certain legal authorities, it was not the only cause that led to the system’s unpreparedness: Many of the structural problems had already existed before. With all of the evidence and some places where people make predictions without evidence, the verdict is this: Most of the comment is accurate. But a couple of points are overstated if not simplistic.

https://www.cbsnews.com/amp/news/unauthorized-drone-flights-rising-threat-u-s-bases-border-events-tom-cotton/?utm

True

Community Rules


• Be respectful
• Always list your sources and include links so readers can check them for themselves.
• Use primary sources when you can, and only go to credible secondary sources if necessary.
• Try to rely on more than one source, especially for big claims.
• Point out if sources you quote have interests that could affect how accurate their evidence is.
• Watch for bias in sources and let readers know if you find anything that might influence their perspective.
• Show all the important evidence, whether it supports or goes against the claim.
...