Question

Technology is the culprit for shortened attention spans

Comments

When there is statements that technology is related to problems relating to the human brain how do you know exactly that is the cause of the problem?

---

I think this is a good argument to have. But do keep in mind that when this was studied they may have not looked in to the other external factors that could result in people having a decreased attention span. I would also recommend looking at a website that has more reliable information as only having one source may not be enough to support it. Looking at other websites that connect to studies that relate to this topic can help more with supporting this claim and making it stronger as a whole.

---

This is an argument that I agree with since, for reasons that are specific to me, I am unable to concentrate on movies without looking at another screen or going to my phone. Furthermore, I believe that the article does not present a counterargument to the hypothesis that social media platforms such as Instagram and TikTok offer educational chances in addition to the potential to advance in one's career.

Answer 1

I appreciate the argument presented here but I cannot forget to mention that you fail to include the fact that the use and the user of these technologies is almost always the sole reason on positive or negative effects of technology. What the user does with the technology after obtaining it whether it be to improve the mind or destroy it is not the fault of technology itself. Refer to this article by by the Ox journal on my point (https://www.oxjournal.org/how-does-technology-affect-the-attention-spans-of-different-age-groups/). Technology can almost always be used for positive outcomes and improving life qualities, by studying, transactions, and more. Of course, people's attention spans are dwindling when they are scrolling endlessly on a social media platform.

Comments

I agree with your statement. There is often a more complex answer and technology frequently takes the blame for the destruction of lives, or attention spans or similar. In reality, the modern economy and prosperity across the United States is the result of new and constantly improving technology. It is a double edged sword.

---

I completely agree. I read the oxjournal link you provided that backed up your claim very well and was reliable. I also agree that is is much more complex, we cant simply blame shortening attention spans to technologically alone, we must acknowledged that there are other social and worldly factors that play a role in this issue.

---

Your assessment of the claim is very thought out and well done. Dot org sites are very trustworthy and add to your credibility when making a claim or fact checking. I also appreciate how to don't dismiss what the claim is saying, but add your own perspective with supportive evidence.

---

You make a great point about the external factors that contribute to the decrease in attention spans due to technology. It's not technology but how we use it that affects attention spans. As your source that you provided stated, tech can enhance learning and convenience, but when used mindlessly, like endless scrolling, it can reduce focus. The key is mindful usage, ensuring technology supports rather than diminishes our attention and productivity.

---

I agree with your claim its very hard to find research that 100% proves if technology actually rots or has a negative impact on the brain like some people think it does? this article shows (https://www.quora.com/Can-digital-tech-internet-cause-brain-damage-and-lower-IQ#:~:text=Some%20studies%20suggest%20that%20excessive,internet%20use%20on%20the%20brain.) that some studies show it does alter the brain in a bad way and others say there is not enough evidence. Which backs up your point that it cant just be the techs fault.

---

I agree with this perspective, and I really like that you brought this up as it is something I didnt even think about.  There is usually "more to the story" or more context to consider in topics like this, and when it comes to technology, it really is up to the user on how they use the technology which means it is harmful to conclude stereotypes or generalize on this topic. Good job analyzing and providing a source that makes sense!

---

I agree with what you're saying. It all depends on the user and how they obtain it. When scrolling on tiktok or watching something on YouTube, the user is the one who has the ability to do anything with the information they receive from it.  I do agree about endless scrolling, you tend to loose focus after while. If you are able to switch your mind off and on with focusing on things.

---

I agree with your statement! It is important to look at different confounding variables that could be affecting these claims. Many studies have shown that, while using certain types of technology for prolonged periods of time does have a negative impact on our brain function, many different types of technology can actually improve brain function. It's always important not to over generalize claims and be specific. Very nice comment!

---

I agree with your assessment. It depends on how you use the technology because technology is not forcing you to aimlessly scroll, that is something you can choose to do. Great job thinking with a different perspective!

---

I like your approach to this topic, specifically how you go into depth on how it is often what we do with the technology that determines the impact on us rather than the technology itself. This is very evident with real life as some use computers to drown away the worries and responsibilities of life with video games and youtube, while at the same time others use that very same technology to conduct cancer research, study weather patterns that helps farmers, and much more. Clearly if we indulge in some of the uses technology has there is evident risk to shortening attention spans as evidenced by the Ox journal, in multiple age groups. This is further evidenced by an article by the American Psychiatric Association (https://www.apa.org/news/podcasts/speaking-of-psychology/attention-spans). They specifically discuss how media has shifted to shorter form content which could be more to blame. I think this is a very relevant argument that should be studied more in depth.

---

I completely agree with your claim that excessive use of technology is not good for the brain and can negatively affect our attention spans. I did some more research on the topic and found a very interesting article on the topic of "doom scrolling" that I thought added more information of the short form-based content.


  Ellis, M. E. (2024, February 21). What Is Doomscrolling? Why It Happens and How It Affects Your Mental Health. Constellation Behavioral Health. https://www.constellationbehavioralhealth.com/blog/what-is-doomscrolling-why-it-happens-and-how-it-affects-your-mental-health/

Answer 2

This claim is true or false based on whether you are a a technological determinist or social constructivist. Although, checking validity for “The median attention span is 47 seconds according to Gloria Mark, Ph.D, from the American Psychology Association”, I looked into Mark’s research and found a podcast where she explained an alarming decline in attention spans because of constant media consumption on screens. Her work was found through logging techniques and came to an AVERAGE of 47 seconds, which is different from a median. She mentioned that the median was 40 seconds of attention. Nonetheless, this claim that technology is the culprit for shortened attention spans is validated by personal experience in society as well. My brothers call it tiktok brain, or brain rot is another term, essentially meaning we cannot focus for as long as we used to, because of doom scrolling on social media platforms like tiktok or instagram reels. Some of my friends can’t even watch movies anymore because they aren’t stimulating enough, so this is very relevant and real.

Attention Span - GLORIA MARK, PhD

Speaking of Psychology: Why our attention spans are shrinking, with Gloria Mark, PhD

Comments

You did a really great job elaborating on this claim and finding great sources and showcasing that this is an idea that's enforced by a personal opinion, and not something that can be proved by studies or experts.

---

I agree that this issue can be looked at from either side, however I would question wether it is the technology or the actual content expressed through the technology that causes this attention span loss. To my understanding this question does have a definitive answer, which is that the claim in this article is false. Technological determinism is often advocated by critics rather than scholars, due to the fact that social media's structure today is a result of commercial forces, rather than inevitable ones.

---

I totally agree with you on this, it definitely depends on person to person. With my own experience I find that my attention span has definitely shortened but when there's certain things that i have to get done i tend to put my mind down to it. overall, i am glad that there have been further studies on this sudden issue that has risen within our age group.

---

I agree with your stance on the topic. You were able to cite your sources immediately and get straight into whether the claim was true or not. You also provided a bunch of facts to back your own claims, which is essential in proving your point. In the response, you connected the topic to your own life and how screen time affects one's attention span, and I was able to clearly understand your opinion.

---

This is a well-thought-out fact check, as it contains specific evidence from credible sources, which is supported by more evidence from personal experiences. Additionally, you were thorough in your corrections of the incorrect data of the mean versus the median, which are important pieces that must not be confused while analyzing data.

---

I agree with your argument. I like that you used your personal observations about "TikTok brain" and "brain rot" resonate with the broader societal experience, further validating the claim that technology impacts attention spans.

Answer 3

Looking at this website, this seems to be a very one sided claim through the website, not arguing both sides, which could add value to their original claim. Is there a specific reason on why you used dailycollegian.com? Are there any other websites where both sides could be shown to prove the claim?

Comments

As the one asking for something to be fact-checked, it's common that the article they share is biased or one-track minded. It's our job as factcheckers to be the ones who find more reliable, researched, and impartial information to cite and form a conclusion with. Let's not worry about OP's article, it's our job to find better sources of information.

---

I liked that you challenged the validity of the article for it being biased, but it could have gone a step further not only by questioning its validity but also by doing your own research to find a more credible, unbiased source. This could further help the person that made this claim to identify why the source they chose isn't exactly trustworthy. But other than that, good analysis.

---

I like how you pointed out the biases in the article. When reading news, it is important to look at who is posting and what their motives are and to look at other points of view. It may also be beneficial to look at credited sources such as research that has been backed up and replicated.

Answer 4

Technology does change our attention spans but that varies from user to user. Someone who doesn't have social media or "scrollable" platforms on their phone won't have the shortened attention span of someone who is constantly on social media. At the end of the day technology does change the attention spans of those who use it so this claim would be considered true. However this source doesn't necessarily prove that. The person who wrote the article (Julia Bragg) is very reputable but this article was written from personal observation and not fact. This article also comes from The University of Massachsettes which is a non-biased student run newspaper and was written fairly recently in February of 2024. There are other sources that prove her claims to be true but that's not apparent in this specific article. One of those sources is TIME magazine which interviewed Margret Sibley who is a psychiatry professor at the University of Washington, and Adam Brown who is a co-directer at St Bonaventure University for the Center of Attention, Memory, and learning. Sibley states in the article that, "about half of adults think their attention spans are getting shorter, and plenty of teachers say the same thing is happening with kids." Adam Brown states that, "there's good reason for concern" and "Inattention has reached 'epidemic' levels." The American Psychological Association also backs this evidence with a study they conducted stating that, "back in 2004, we found the average attention span on any screen to be two and a half minutes on average. Throughout the years it became shorter. So around 2012 we found it to be 75 seconds." Over all, this claim is true but the article specifically used doesn't have enough evidence to make its claim true.

https://www.linkedin.com/in/julia-bragg

https://time.com/6302294/why-you-cant-focus-anymore-and-what-to-do-about-it/

https://www.apa.org/news/podcasts/speaking-of-psychology/attention-spans

Comments

I think you make a great point that the effect of technology varies greatly form person to person. Although there might be a trend showing a correlation between presence of technology and length of attention spans, there is no true answer to the question because no two people are the same and the effects will vary greatly from person to person.

---

you did a great job explaining this article. I agree that it really depends on who uses the technology and how well you can pay attention for. Since no two people are alike and the impacts will differ widely from person to person, there is no definitive answer to the question, even though there may be a trend indicating a correlation between the existence of technology and attention span length.

Answer 5

I partially agree that social media platforms have created a shorter attention span for teenagers and children. I can see the effects of this from my friends and siblings; sometimes they are not able to sit through long videos or talks. But I also believe that the leading cause of the shortened attention span is not just technology, but also the rise in attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) diagnoses, according to the article pasted here: (https://www.npr.org/sections/shots-health-news/2024/05/23/1252941968/adhd-diagnoses-are-rising-1-in-9-u-s-kids-have-gotten-one-new-study-finds). The article shows that since the pandemic, there has been a rise in ADHD diagnoses, as well as the finding that 1 in 9 kids have been diagnosed with ADHD. The recent rise in popularity of TikTok and other social media platforms that feature short-length entertainment might be a small reason for the decline in kids' attention spans, but the main reason should be the disorder that they cannot control.

Answer 6

"Technology is the culprit for shortened attention spans" explains that the reason why our ability to focus or concentrate for extended periods is due to the persuasive use of digital devices and social media. Though that may be the reason to some people can't focus but it depends on the actual person. Attention spans have fluctuated overtime, the changes in media and society have an affect on this. I understand that technology may change how we might process information, but it does not necessarily mean that our attention spans become shorter. We also have the option to pay attention if we want if you find what you hear or see is interesting or isn't that's on you. This link provides a discussion between these two concepts.  https://modernmrsdarcy.com/interest-span-vs-attention-span/ Attention spans refers to the ability to focus on a task on the other hand interest span relates to how long an individual will be engaged with your activity or subject. 

Answer 7

The general claim that technology is harming our attention span could mostly be considered false due to how broad the claim is. It fails to take into account many variables, such as how people use technology and what kind of technology they use. Studies have shown that using certain types of technology can have negative impacts on the brain including attention and mood, but some studies have shown that it can be helpful to brain function depending on how/what is being used. 

Brain health consequences of digital technology use
 - PMC (nih.gov)

Answer 8

I completely agree with this claim and/or article as I have always believed that the usage of technology, smartphones, tv and other technical entertainment whether I enjoy the usage of it or not cause massive attention span shortages. From someone with ADHD and growing up during the early 2000s I have never not been around the usage of technology and have seen my attention span shortened by the usage of it. I would also like to add this article regarding the same topic but more so how "They can take a break, they can go to social media, they can go to a news site and they can take a break, relax themselves, then they can come back to work." Many of us have proven that our attention spans are even greater now as a newer generation has adapted to the usage of social media, tv, video games, etc while working. https://www.apa.org/news/podcasts/speaking-of-psychology/attention-spans