The article claims that “there is no scientific evidence that blue light from digital devices causes damage to your eye”. Upon searching this claim, many articles appeared from well-established research facilities such as the American Academy of Opthalmology, which created the article being fact-checked, Harvard Health, the National Center for Biotechnological Information, and the Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center. Additionally, websites such as Web MD and US News Health cited the American Academy of Opthalmology in articles addressing the same claim. Given the AAO’s establishment as a reliable, scientific research organization, founded in 1896 as a professional association specializing in the study of eye health, the research it conducts is widely trusted. In addition, their results are supported by separate studies conducted by other research-based and university-level organizations. However, the AAO, Harvard Health, and the National Center for Biotechnological Information all acknowledge that research on the effects of blue light is relatively new and long-term effects are yet to be determined or researched. Overall, the article is balanced and explains digital eye strain caused by devices and blue light’s proven effect on the circadian rhythm, while assessing that there is a lack of evidence to support the claim that blue light causes damage to the eye. The article is edited by a Public Relations Manager of AAO, reviewed by Rahul Khurana, who has an extensive medical and education background on eye health, and written by Celia Vimont, a free-lance medical journalist of over 20 years, who has worked with various hospitals, non-profits, and professional publishing companies. The personnel involved in this writing have relevant backgrounds and experience in their fields, asserting their reliability. Based on supporting claims, reliable authors and facilities, and balanced reporting, I would say this claim is true.