This response does an excellent job showcasing careful research and effective fact-checking, which are essential skills for a fact-check journalist. I liked how you demonstrated thoroughness by verifying The Economist's claim with the original 2017 Royal Society for Public Health (RSPH) survey, proving that the link in the article was outdated and providing the updated link for some credibility. By citing additional sources from UC Davis Health, Yale Medicine, and the National Library of Medicine, you also establish that the claim is widely supported by very reputable institutions, which strengthens your argument and helps readers stay informed from multiple different perspectives.