The scientific debate over the benifits of organic food vs. the unconventional prices has gone on for a long time. Some studies point to higher antioxidant levels and lower cadmium and pesticide levels in the organic crops. Differences are small and their impact on human health isn't conclusively demonstrated
Nutrition depends on a variety of factors such as soil condition, time of harvesting, and storage, which may overrule the effects of agricultural practices (Smith & Jones, 2019). Hence, to what extent organic farming alone contributes to changing the nutrient content is unclear. In addition, although organic produce typically has less pesticide residue, regulatory agencies assert that conventional produce typically exceeds safety standards, leaving the real-world health effects of reduced exposure to pesticides (Mayo Clinic, 2022; EWG, 2023).
Socioeconomic issues compound the question. Organic produce is also more expensive, presenting accessibility concerns, and whether the potential benefit is worth the cost to all (Lee & Kim, 2021).
In summary, while organic foods may be a bit unique in some nutritional compositions and pesticide levels, the evidence for important benefits to health is not clear. It takes more research to answer these associations, especially those that consider both nutritional and economic determinants.