I agree with the idea that supporting your statistics with a source would have made your argument significantly better and definitely more credible. Without a source, it is a lot harder to believe whether this information is true or not, and to what extent it is true or false. Although bad kid up by statistics, there is a sense of opinion within the argument that Jokic is bound to win MVP for the season. As the season progresses, we are able to narrow down the candidates in the MVP race, but there is never certainty on who will actually win until the trophy is awarded. Aside from the lack of mentioned sources, I like the way the argument was constructed.