Although this whole claim is opinion based, there are parts to it that are undeniably true, as well as parts that can't be considered true or false. The sub claim he is putting up eye catching numbers and then listing his stats is completely true, but the claim that he is the MVP this season is not only too soon to be determined, but also very aggressive and far fetched this soon into the season. The evidence used was a CBS sports article is very opinion based, but also mixed in is analytical data that does help back up the claim. It talks about how he himself is solely carrying his team through the season, bringing up the poor play of his teammates. Although his teammates may not be performing up to their usual standards, to say he is getting no help from them is a huge overstatement.
https://www.espn.com/nba/team/stats/_/name/den/denver-nuggets
These statistics from ESPN do prove Nikola Jokic to have significantly better statistics then all of his teammates, but it also shows 5 of his teams averaging double figures in points, as well as one other average 20 or more points per game. These statistics hurt the opinion from the CBS article that he is getting no help from his teammates.
https://www.espn.com/espn/betting/story/_/id/42952719/2024-25-nba-mvp-betting-odds-favorites-jokic-doncic-sga-giannis
These ESPN statistics show the current odds for who the winner of the MVP will be. Although the statement Jokic is the MVP can't be proved until the award is given out , and can be proved to highly probable if he seems to be the clear front runner for the award. The issue is, he is far behind in second place, with Shai Gilgeous being way more favored at odds of -550, while Jokic is trailing by a considerable amount with odds at +350, which shows he has a far less then 50 percent chance of winning. Although the claim can't be proven to be true or false, it does appear at the moment that it is highly improbable for that outcome to become a reality.