8 like 5 dislike
in General Factchecking by Apprentice (1.4k points)
A CNN article came out and claimed that dogs may be able to smell infectious diseases, and can help detect covid in K-12 school. Is this true?
by Newbie (480 points)
0 0
According to UC Santa Barbara Science and Technology, Dogs can technically smell "symptoms" of COVID-19 illnesses. Professor at UCSB Tommy Dickey did some research, after working with therapy dogs he decided to look into the science part of things and began to conduct a study. He claims dogs can do the same work that an at-home covid test does, which consists of 95% accuracy.  Which overall means dogs can sniff out Presymtimcatic, asymptomatic and symptomatic forms of covid-19.

https://news.ucsb.edu/2023/021174/dogs-can-detect-covid-19-infections-faster-and-more-accurately-conventional-technology#:~:text=The%20dog%20standard&text=All%20these%20enhancements%20mean%20that,swimming%20pools%2C”%20Dickey%20said.

24 Answers

0 like 0 dislike
by Novice (710 points)
After doing some research of my own I have found that there is some truth to dogs being able to smell infectious diseases. This is due to the fact that dogs can inhale way more than humans. This does not mean that every dog can sniff out disease with ease, and it often takes training for dogs to be able to reliably sniff out things like COVID, cancer, and other diseases.

https://www.understandinganimalresearch.org.uk/news/the-science-of-sniffs-disease-smelling-dogs
0 like 0 dislike
by Novice (910 points)
The claim is that dogs are able to smell Covid-19, and apparently, this claim seems to be somewhat accurate. The study has been ongoing for years; at the beginning of Covid, I remember hearing a similar story. I had also heard that dogs have been able to sniff out cancer, so this is not as hard to believe. An article from UC Santa Barbara seems to back this up, citing that this test has grown from just 4 papers to 29 peer-reviewed studies. UCLA Health cites that dogs can be up to 97% accurate when sniffing out Covid.

https://news.ucsb.edu/2023/021174/dogs-can-detect-covid-19-infections-faster-and-more-accurately-conventional-technology

https://www.uclahealth.org/news/specially-trained-dogs-can-sniff-out-covid-19-infection
0 like 0 dislike
by Apprentice (1.2k points)
The most important distinction to make in this article is the fact that dogs do not necessarily smell the COVID-19 virus itself, but scents presented when people are exhibiting symptoms of the disease, even symptoms that are usually undetectable by humans. This journalistic article taken from the National Library of Medicine supports the claims made by CNN and affirms the fact that there is genuine science backing up the use of dogs in detecting infections of COVID-19.

Overall, this does not appear to be misinformation.

Source cited: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9751420/
0 like 0 dislike
by Novice (640 points)

I thought this claim was interesting because I have not heard of other educational institutions implementing this method of detecting Covid-19 in students. I first began to research government websites to test if they were representing Dr. Carol Glaser’s work accurately. After looking at the National Library of Medicine website, CNN did a great job touching base on the studies that Dr. Glaser and her team did. They wanted to detect if they can see if dogs smell volatile organic compounds (VOC) in individuals. However, they did not highlight until the very end that “dogs demonstrated 83% sensitivity and 90% specificity when it came to detecting Covid-19 in the study.” They elaborate that the environment of children was too overstimulating for the dogs to do their appropriate job, although they got better at detecting infections over time. This article is accurate in its storytelling, and it is good that the title includes that the study is a new suggestion, since more studies need to be conducted to fully see if dogs can be the new resource for detecting infections. 

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10126941/

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33394052/

True

Community Rules


• Be respectful
• Always list your sources and include links so readers can check them for themselves.
• Use primary sources when you can, and only go to credible secondary sources if necessary.
• Try to rely on more than one source, especially for big claims.
• Point out if sources you quote have interests that could affect how accurate their evidence is.
• Watch for bias in sources and let readers know if you find anything that might influence their perspective.
• Show all the important evidence, whether it supports or goes against the claim.
...