Question

People who are single are happier because they are living their most authentic lives without having to worry about someone else.

Comments

I totally agree with you. The article definitely seems to lack solid evidence, and it only focuses on specific perspectives instead of considering broader groups and using those responses as a foundation. It’s still an interesting topic that makes you think, though!

---

While the idea of living your "most authentic life" sounds appealing, the claim overlooks the nuance in the original study. The research didn’t prove that being single makes people happier, just that some single people report being happy. Consider looking at the sources hyperlinked in the article or sources that explore happiness in both single and partnered people for a broader perspective.

---

Being single can make some people happier because it gives them freedom and independence. Others might feel lonely without a partner. Overall, happiness depends on personal preferences and life circumstances. People in good relationships tend to be happy, but only if the relationship is healthy. It’s really about what works best for each person.

---

I totally agree with your point. Contentment with being single varies from person to person, and there's no concrete evidence that everyone or the majority of people are happier not being in a relationship. Plus, the article didn't prove that single people are happier, just that some single people are happy. It depends on a variety of factors.

---

As I'm reading this article it is lacking evidence and it really is talking about the way of being single is and the type of feelings you are going to have but not really referring to the pros and cons of being in a relationship .That saying that single is happier are living their most authentic lives without to worry about someone else is a big understandment of how in the BuzzFeed the other perspectives didn’t. In this article psychology today of will you be happier single or in a relationship i like as it gives in both perspectives and it really does depend on who you are in a person

Answer 1

The article explains that being single nowadays leads to greater happiness and overall enjoyment in mundane activities. The claim that "single people are happier" is subjective and can be taken from person to person. The article links data explaining the difficulties of dating and the overall rise of single people. Although, yes, dating is different from how it used to be with online dating apps and new social norms, these articles don't support the claim. The data they provide is about divorce rates which isn't enough to back up their article. I believe that this claim is too subjective and they don't provide the correct data to support their claim.

https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2020/08/20/nearly-half-of-u-s-adults-say-dating-has-gotten-harder-for-most-people-in-the-last-10-years/

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0265407515597564

Comments

I liked your answer about this article being too subjective. I agreed with this standpoint and the author of the BuzzFeed article stretching the actual truth. The divorce rates were not enough evidence to explain why single people could be happier. The article could of done more surveys about why people choose to be single, rather than the decline of married people from a certain age range. Great response!

---

I really enjoyed this response. I think they gave a good explanation on why the claim was necessarily false. They pointed out how although people do say that dating is harder and divorce rates are fluctuating it isn't enough to support the broad statement of being single makes you happier. They also provided great articles that support what they are saying . Overall I think this did a great job at fact checking and showed the arguments that may confuse people into thinking the claim was true.

---

I think this is a great response to the claim. I like how you point out how a claim like this can vary from person to person. I also like how you saw the article was more focused on divorce, which overall does not have anything to do with the claim, "People who are single are happier because they are living their most authentic lives without having to worry about someone else." Sure, some relationships and marriages can be tough, but that doesn't necessarily mean everyone would be happier single either.

---

I really enjoyed this response! Pointing out the subjectivity of this claim is something I feel was incredibly important, and I think it was excellent that you went as far as to provide studies on the subject matter to further delve in to the thoughts and feelings of others on the topic despite its being subjective.

---

I agree with your analysis, especially your emphasis on the subjectiveness of happiness, and I appreciate how you pointed out the lack of sufficient data to fully support the claim. It’s insightful that you noted how the article relies on divorce rates, which don’t directly address the complexities of happiness in singlehood.

Answer 2

I think this article focuses too much on why single people are happy but doesn't really give any information to compare to the happiness of people in a relationship. Additionally, may be too subjective to make a claim.

Comments

I agree with your response. While some people are happier being single, there are also a lot of other people that are happier in relationships. A comparison between the two would be interesting but since this is so subjective it doesn't really matter.

---

i mean, thank you for your comment but I cant necessarily expand upon what i said, emotions are subjective and happiness is not a quantifiable attribute and thus the statement cannot be proven or disproven, hence why I marked it as such

---

You make a great point about the author not mentioning the comparison of single to people in a relationship's happiness overall. Just giving the data that said that there are less married people now is not a sufficient claim to examine if a single person is happier. You had a great idea that I did not think of before of what the author could of done to make this article more truthful. Great response!

---

I agree with your response that the author is not comparing the amount of happiness in a relationship to the amount of happiness when single. This alone defeats the author's entire claim because you cannot prove cause without analyzing both sides.

---

I completely agree with what you are saying, especially when you say how this topic is too subjective to make a claim on. However, to further advance this fact-check, the use of evidence and potentially linking an article backing up your statement could be beneficial and making your answer more reliable. You could possibly find an article that discusses the happiness of people in marriages, etc.

Answer 3

The relationship between happiness and relationship status is influenced by too many factors to be 100% true or false. Some people thrive in relationships, while others feel more fulfilled on their own.

Comments

I agree with you, there are too many personal factors in relationships and happiness. This makes it way too difficult to make a claim for the entire population about happiness based off of relationship status.

---

This is very true because the article is very opinionated based so one person's experience won't be the next person's. It can all vary on what was going on between them vs. when they were/are single. As humans whether we like to admit it or not, we need that romantic aspect in our lives. In one shape or another.

---

I think this is true because one's relationship status cannot determine happiness. It all depends on your own personal experience with a partner and there are so many different factors that go into it for each person.

---

Though I agree with your point, your claim would be made much more reliable if you could find some sort of source to confirm your stance. Even a quote from a relationship therapist (of some sort) supporting your opinion would be sufficient. And, if you found evidence against your claim, then, perhaps, your perspective on this topic might change in light of a different scholarly outlook. In short, though I agree with your statement (at first glance), your factcheck is simply an opinion and requires some sort of evidence to establish any sort of credibility.

---

I agree with what you are saying, this a difficult one to fact check as it all goes with personal expierence, I think it could be helpful to find someway to back up your claim or you are also just stating your own opinion online with no sources.

---

i think this is true. just like many people thrive in social situations, and others don't, relationships are for some people, but not all. i do however, believe that this is opinion based and it would help your claim to have evidence or an article.

---

Agree completely, relationships are too subjective to make a claim like this. The article seems to be more an opinion piece than a legitimate scientific claim. However I would recommend citing a source you used.

---

I agree with your comment, however, including some factual evidence and citing your sources will make your point even more powerful. Some factors you could include when talking about the happiness in or out of relationships are their mental health, their socioeconomic status, their sexual orientation (maybe someone is asexual/aromantic and are happier without a partner because they were born like that).

---

While I agree that individuals can have different experiences with relationships, asking whether single people are happier as a general trend can still be categorized as true or false. This is also a useful question, as it can inform policy, and help academics studying happiness explore what might make the world a happier place.

---

While I agree with your comment, including sources to back up your claim about how individual experiences and what is considered happiness in this article and studies regarding such would make your argument much stronger. I recommend looking for a peer reviewed psychology journal article as it would hold more credibility in face of original claim.

---

You're absolutely right—happiness and relationship status are influenced by so many factors. Personality, life experiences, social support, and mental health all play a role. For example, studies like the Harvard Study of Adult Development show that strong social connections (from partners, friends, or family) contribute to happiness. But some people feel more fulfilled and independent when single, and others find happiness in relationships that allow for personal growth. It's really about individual needs and circumstances-so trying to make broad claims misses that complexity.

Answer 4

This article addresses a subject that is hard to prove statistically and one that varies greatly from person to person. The main claim of the article though, is that people CAN be happier when single, but there isn't necessarily a cause and effect relationship between the two. 

This article originates from Buzzfeed, which is a source that thrives off of sensational headlines and opinions. Often times while they can be interesting, Buzzfeed isn't a great source for trustworthy reporting. Focusing on specifically the author, she has written a book as well as hosted a podcast. She has experience with the topic as she has been single for a long time. This can be both good and bad for validity as she has firsthand experience with the topic and can speak from that experience, but it also leads to a lot of bias on the topic and possible exaggeration or withholding of information on the topic. 

I was looking at other articles covering the same topic, and came across this one. The article is slightly different, as it focuses on the reverse claim, that single people are less happy than people in a relationship. The article sources research data showing that people who are single are unhappier. But the article also focuses on a more important claim: "those who dismissed relationships as unimportant were more satisfied with their lives than single young adults who were less dismissive of romantic relationships."

The ultimate point of this article is that the happiness of people based on relationship isn't necessarily a result of being in a relationship, but more the mindset and views of people regarding desire for a relationship. Ultimately, this is a really cloudy topic with no definite answer based purely on the happiness of anybody who is single. The true determining factor of relationship based happiness is more what you make of being in a relationship rather than whether or not you are in one. 

Comments

I agree with you that the factor of influence degree of happies is different for each one. It depend on the personal value and experience. The situation of being single may be one kinds of factor but the it may influence less, which other kinds of factors can cover the factor of single.

---

Good critique of the article and its potential bias! I really like how you pointed out Buzzfeed's tendency for sensationalism and its credibility. What you said on mindset being the real factor for happiness is really interesting and I think this would be even better if you looked at studies on attachment styles among diferent people and how they do influence happiness.

---

I appreciated reading this fact check because it examines the claim without providing a definitive answer about whether single people are "happier" than those in relationships. Instead, it acknowledges that the answer depends on each individual's personal experience. I also liked how you used reliable sources to support your points, making your response clear and easy to follow.

---

This is a great fact-check!! Your thought process is super insightful and thorough. There are many factors to this claim that can be hard to address and you did that super well! You also brought in another source that had a new perspective to consider. The source was also reliable and a good resource for this topic.

---

This is a really great response I love how you talked about the source being untrustworthy as it consistently reports wrong information. I also really liked how you found a source with the inverse claim that was actually backed up by data.

Answer 5

I think there is some truth to this claim in the sense that as a single person you are less limited by a spouse and thus have less responsibilities, don't have to make time for a relationship, and certainly when it comes to dating there is a lot of money to be saved. This may set you up for a more self-fulfilling life but I would argue that for many if not most people it's within our human nature to want to have a spouse and share life's greatest memories, challenges, burdens, and victories with someone else. These are all things that would give great meaning to life and cause abundant happiness and joy, even in the midst of trial. It is even evidenced in scripture that relationships are a good thing, a gift from God and meant to fulfill us and give us happiness, "Then the Lord God said, “It is not good that the man should be alone; I will make him a helper fit for him.” This is of course in reference to the creation of Eve in Genesis 2:18(ESV).(https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Genesis%202%3A18&version=ESV) 

 It is interesting the statistics we are seeing today with a general rise in loneliness in society, lots of the research is linked to friendships but there has also been great connection to fewer marriages in our day and age. I believe that people who are in a healthy relationship are much more likely to be happy and avoid loneliness far more often. According to the American Psychiatric Association stating, "...with 30% of Americans aged 18-34 saying they were lonely every day or several times a week, and single adults are nearly twice as likely as married adults to say they have been lonely on a weekly basis over the past year (39% vs. 22%)." This statistic is highly alarming as it represents a nearly 2x increase in loneliness in those who are single. I believe that loneliness would be a huge roadblock to anyone trying to live a happy life. (https://www.psychiatry.org/news-room/news-releases/new-apa-poll-one-in-three-americans-feels-lonely-e#:~:text=Younger%20people%20were%20more%20likely,22%25).)

Comments

This factcheck is strong! It's a good start to have 2 articles that potentially target this fact in a different approach. While relationships in general are very personable and subject to the person in the relationship, that leads to various factors such as the ones you mentioned in the first sentence. I find it interesting that one of the sources take a biblical take on this since in those relationships were encouraged for happiness and evolution. I like that you did follow up with a statistic and the source that deals directly with people in my age range as well as a vast amount of people. Great job, unique take!

---

This is a great fact-check, you argued your claim, gave good evidence, and described the evidence. I think the use of two sources that are considerably different is an exceptional idea because you can argue your point across stronger.   In the future, I would start with a short introduction and use the article you're arguing against in your response as well. Other than that awesome job!

Answer 6

This statement can be looked at through the eyes of a person who is single and someone who is in a relationship. The author who wrote this article is credible, Katie Camero, a health and wellness journalist https://www.usatoday.com/staff/8433499001/katie-camero (about her). It doesn't give enough information about people currently in a relationship or married couples. This specific article gives an intro to this idea, but not solid overall evidence. There are more articles that can show this with studies behind them with different perspectives. An example is https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/happy-together/202402/are-single-or-partnered-young-adults-happier it gives backing evidence and surveyed different people not just people who are single. 

Comments

I appreciate your use of multiple sources, and your perspective on the multiple perspectives that this claim can be seen from. Your use of Psychology Today as a source improves a lot upon the claim's original source which is a buzzfeed article. This claim is subjective and you did a great job showing that.

---

I agree that this claim can be viewed from two different perspectives. I also found the blog you cited interesting and think it gives an honest claim with evidence to back it up.

---

This was a very well done factcheck and I enjoy your use of multiple sources and stating their credibility as it adds a layer of reliable information. I also agree with your statement and how this topic can be subjective depending on the perspective.

Answer 7

The subject this article is trying to prove is too broad and there are many influencing factors to create an accurate statistic or evidence to support the claim. I am not sure BuzzFeed is the most accurate news source. The evidence they do provide does not prove much since the claim is too broad to be able to prove. Here is a study I found better explaining the claim of the BuzzFeed article. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/02654075221122887

Comments

This is a great fact-check, and I appreciate how effectively you identified that the subject is too broad. It's also important that you expressed your uncertainty about the reliability of the BuzzFeed article. I would agree that BuzzFeed is not the most reliable source. To further strengthen your point about its credibility, it might be helpful to research and include additional reliable sources or explain more specifically why BuzzFeed's credibility might be lacking.

---

This was a good fact check overall! Although I agree that the article in question is too broad and there are too many factors to create a true cause and effect case, I think to benefit the fact check it would have been helpful to provide examples of where in the text this unclarity was spotted. Although to explain a bit more about the article you found, as opposed to only adding the link, could also help to build a stronger argument. Overall though, this was a good fact check.

Answer 8

I think this article does a really good job of showing you examples of people who are happy AND singe, but does not do a lot of work in proving that the two are at all related to each other. This article had no experiment or study that scientifically searched for a genuine answer to this question which is why I think it did not prove its point. I would also not consider buzzfeed to be the most credible source of information.

Comments

I think this fact-check does an excellent job of sharing a logical opinion on both the issue and the source. However, I fail to see any of your own sources. IT would be nice to see a source that you provided so that we could get a credible alternative.

---

Thank you for pointing out the noncredible use of BuzzFeed as the only provided source. I completely agree with your statement that this is an extremely subjective subject with no concrete way to judge happiness levels in or out of a relationship. In fact, the exact opposite can be argued as well. Although I do not believe that it is as black and white as people in relationships are happy and single people are not, I would like to provide the counter argument with this source. I believe that not every case is the same and happiness applied to relationship status is very abstract and ever-changing.
https://www.cnn.com/2024/02/09/health/marriage-happiness-wellness/index.html#:~:text=Over%20the%20survey%20period%2C%20married,year%2C%20according%20to%20the%20data.

---

i think this is a good factcheck, but it would be nice to see some sources of your own to make the factcheck more accurate and reliable, to further prove your point that the article isn't credible.

---

You did bring out a valid point that the article does not have any strong studies or experiments to prove their claims. Without evidence, it's just anecdotal, and does not provide a direct correlation between singleness and happiness. It's easy to look at individual cases of people who are happy while single, but that doesn't account for the complexity of human happiness or relationships. For example, theres a study by the National Institute of Mental Health that discovered that happiness tends to be connected with the kind of social support that a person may have-a partner, friends, or family. Being single can definitely be a fulfilling choice for some people, but saying that it's a universal truth for happiness doesn't seem plausible without research. Curious to see a deeper dive into these variables!

Answer 9

According to Psychology Today, It is all up to personal interpretation of a relationship. If one perceives a relationship as important, they will most likely be more miserable if they are not coupled up,"They also found that those who dismissed relationships as unimportant were more satisfied with their lives than single young adults who were less dismissive of romantic relationships" was stated in the article, "Are Single or Partnered People Happier?"

Comments

The article that you referenced was written by credible authors, but I would love to see more information from a study done specifically on this issue. The article that you used mentions a study done on the topic, and you could've used more of that to back up your factcheck.

---

I think that it is difficult to quantify happiness, but the article you linked explicitly describes a study done to back the original claim and I think that Psychology Today is a credible source. A secondary study that agrees with the claim may also be helpful but regardless it is hard to accurately reach a conclusion that addresses the claim in a binary manner.

Answer 10

Buzzfeed news claims that people who are single are happier and live more authentic lives. Personally, I am skeptical of this claim right off the bat just because I feel like relationships are personal and this is a broad statement. Even with the statistics I feel like that topic is very opinion based and can be biased based off each individuals experience. When looking this statement up no other news sources credit it and buzzfeed technically is not a reliable news source to begin with. The title on this factcheck is slightly different from the articles title and has just a brief explanation of what is written so there is very minor details. Overall, I personally think this is biased and needs more evidence to back it up. 

Comments

Your approach to this fact check was good. By questioning the source, looking for other evidence, and pointing out potential bias, you showed great critical thinking in your fact-check process.