Question

People who are single are happier because they are living their most authentic lives without having to worry about someone else.

Comments

Great fact check! You critically analyzed and researched the original claim, including checking out the original source material. In addition, you provided us with an additional resource from a research center that, while not giving a definitive answer, supports your point that the original claim is not necessarily true. I think you make an awesome point that the original claim is very subjective and hard to verify in most contexts.

---

Great breakdown of the gaps in evidence. It makes a lot of sense that divorce rates and dating challenges don’t inherently link to happiness. I might mention that happiness is influenced by lots of factors like finances or friendships, maybe also using psychological studies on well-being in single vs. partnered life.

---

I like how much detail and effort you out into this. You added evidence and looked at multiple sides, making your point stronger. Thank you for including the article you received your information too as well it helps back up the claims!

---

You make a great point about the article not proving that single people are happier. To back up a claim like that, they’d need better evidence, like studies showing how happy single people are compared to people in relationships. The Pew Research article is good for showing how dating has changed, but it doesn’t really answer the question about happiness. Maybe the article could have used research about stress, life satisfaction, or mental health in singles vs. couples to make a stronger case. Adding those kinds of studies could really help support or challenge the claim.

---

Great Fact Check. I completely agree with how you make a substantial point proving how the article needs stronger evidence to back up the claim the article is asserting. I was also pleased by how you added verification and assessed multiple points of view.

Answer 1

The article explains that being single nowadays leads to greater happiness and overall enjoyment in mundane activities. The claim that "single people are happier" is subjective and can be taken from person to person. The article links data explaining the difficulties of dating and the overall rise of single people. Although, yes, dating is different from how it used to be with online dating apps and new social norms, these articles don't support the claim. The data they provide is about divorce rates which isn't enough to back up their article. I believe that this claim is too subjective and they don't provide the correct data to support their claim.

https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2020/08/20/nearly-half-of-u-s-adults-say-dating-has-gotten-harder-for-most-people-in-the-last-10-years/

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0265407515597564

Comments

I like the angle that you took on this and think you brought up some interesting points. I agree that they do have a lack of data to support their argument especially when it technically not relevant. There are many reasons for divorce outside of unhappiness. I would also argue that having a partner to do the mundane activities with would cause you to find more enjoyment in them because it's another time that you get to be with someone you care about. Yes, the dating world is a lot different nowadays and I would even say that it's a lot smaller than it used to be, but I think that it's still possible to find happiness in a relationship, it may just take some work, which not everyone is willing to do. There's nothing wrong with that but just because someone doesn't want to put in the effort to find a partner doesn't mean that you're better off without one.

---

In this claim, I agree that the happiness of single people is too subjective and lacks adequate supporting data. I also agree that the differences in individual experiences and the constant changing of relationships suggest that better evidence is needed to prove claims about happiness.

---

I agree with you that this claim is subjective and that you can't really measure happiness. People may be happy or unhappy due to many factors in their lives whether they are single or in a partnership. I also like that you used an academic source as opposed to a political news source for this topic.

---

I enjoyed reading your response and found that I agreed with your answer. Happiness is a philosophical question that is subjective and impossible to measure. Not only is the title of this article misleading, but it is false. Thank you for clarifying that their data did not relate to the claim.

---

I like your fact check because you add the viewpoint of the opposition. This contrast helps people understand that there isn't one true view and therefore is an opinion, not a fact.

---

I strongly agree that the claim made here is subjective. Ignoring all the evidence for a second, saying someone is "happier" because they are single varies person-to-person and cannot be generalized to the whole population. I also liked that you linked to research done by Pew on dating trends because it shows why someone MIGHT think this is true but also why it isn't. Going off of that, I liked that you acknowledged the argument from both sides of the claim, showing that there is no right answer to this.

---

Your statement and reasoning make a lot of sense. I totally agree this statement is very opinion based and cannot be proven true or false. Pew Research Center is a really credible website—I’ve used it multiple times for my own projects. Their studies are super detailed and give a lot of good insights into social issues and trends.

---

I like the angle you took factchecking this claim stating that single people are happier. Saying it's subjective and looking at it from both points of view is the way to answer such claim, as it seems more of an opinion than a scientifically backed claim. I want to add to your factcheck and say that being happier or not doesn't have to do so much with being in a relationship or not, but many other external factors like financial situation and other relationships with the people around you. Nonetheless, you did a great job researching the claim and getting to the bottom of this.

---

I agree with the stance that you took in regards to this claim and appreciate your factcheck.  In my opinion, this "claim" from Buzzfeed News was never a claim to begin with, moreso just stating that more people, specifically women, are beginning to accept and appreciate being single. Additionally, after some research, Buzzfeed News has been noted in the past as having inconsistent editorial quality, so taking their writing as a serious claim is maybe not the best idea. I also agree with your stance that the studies they used are not the best. You mentioned divorce rates, but the Buzzfeed News article mentions a study stating single people as not being married or living with their partner -- I'm sure you can imagine just how many people are currently in a committed relationship, but not necessarily living with or married to their partner. Overall, great job with this fact check and taking a stance and explaining your thought behind it!

---

Good response. Your sources are very reputable. I also firmly believe in your conclusion- whether or not being single makes you happier is incredible subjective.

---

I think the claim is way too opinion-based to be proved either way. If anything, it doesn't seem to be a "claim", just more of a "statement". You did a good job at having a neutral stance on the take.

---

The approach you took to debunking the claim "single people are happier" was very effective, as you debunked each claim by proving that the data provided was not credible to prove the claim right.  I agree with you that the data provided did not directly relate to or support the claim made. The claim is far too subjective and would be very difficult ot be proven with data.

---

You raise some excellent issues in this article, particularly about how the assertion that "single people are happier" is highly arbitrary and not true for everyone. Indeed, the essay seems to take this concept and run with it without providing enough solid evidence to support it. Statistics on divorce rates don't necessarily indicate that single people are happier; they only indicate that more people are opting out of marriage, which isn't the same thing. If the article contained research that directly compared the happiness of single and coupled people over time, it would be far more persuasive. Well done for recognizing that their data doesn't entirely support the assertion they're attempting to make.

---

I agree with your stance. I like how you talked about how there is some truth to the claim. However, it is not correct in the sense that it is the only right answer due to the fact that the topic is subjective from person to person.

---

I agree with your analysis of the description of happiness as being alone in mundane activities rather than with a partner also subjective. The claim itself leans heavily on causation and doesn't take into account the happiness they may of had with there partner as that would be the obvious comparison that it is not compared too.

---

I completely agree with you. Being in a relationship is opinionated. I do feel that sometimes it’s hard to find your person. In that case it’s an objective.

---

I agree that happiness really varies from person to person. The article talks about the increase in single people and the challenges of dating, however it mostly uses divorce rates, which doesn't directly prove that being single equals more happiness. For a better more accurate view, studies from the Pew Research Center mixed results of this study. Some report single people enjoy more freedom, while others say that married people often report being happier. I think that if the article had better concrete sources it would be a more credible claim.

---

I agree with your stance I think it was taken more as an opinion and it really varies person to person. I also agree it is important to consider the causation vs correlation of this issue and the fact that human connection raises happiness.

---

I agree that happiness is subjective and varies widely. The article's claim that being alone leads to greater happiness overlooks the potential joy people find in partnerships. It primarily relies on divorce rates, which only show an increase in people opting out of marriage, not necessarily greater happiness among singles. Since the podcast was also single for so long with different views on romance it feels as though he picked and chose info to support his claim and bias. For a more persuasive argument, it should include research directly comparing the happiness of single and coupled individuals over time.

---

Those who are single, dont have to depend on others right away for an answer. If one feels as though their answer isnt enough validation they might ask their partner after. We depend so much on our significant other because we devote so much of our life to them that the bond you and another individual have can become toxic.  https://maria-nicholas.medium.com/why-you-must-prioritize-your-emotional-needs-in-a-relationship-e3b307bd914a

---

I definitely agree with your take saying "single people are happier" does feel like an vague thing to say, especially since happiness is subjective and varies widely among individuals. Linking data on divorce rates or the rise of single people doesn’t directly back up the claim about happiness, as they’re different issues. The articles seem to imply that single people enjoy life more because they have more time or freedom, but that doesn't necessarily mean they’re happier. I’m curious to know did you come across any research that actually measured happiness levels between single and partnered individuals? And did the article explore how life satisfaction might change over time for single people versus those in relationships?

---

I agree that happiness is highly individual and varies from person to person. The article discusses the rise in single people and the challenges of dating, but it primarily uses divorce rates, which doesn’t directly prove that being single leads to more happiness. For a more accurate perspective, studies like those from the Pew Research Center offer mixed results. Some findings show that single people enjoy more freedom, while others indicate that married people report higher levels of happiness. I believe the article would be more credible if it relied on stronger, more concrete sources to support its claims.

---

I agree that one of the main points that needs to be highlighted when it comes to factchecking this assignment is addressing that happiness is highly subjective, and the definition is the same for no two people. Good work pointing this out!

---

I completely agree that saying "single people are happier" feels overly general, especially given that happiness is highly personal and varies so much among individuals. Data on divorce rates or the increase in single-person households doesn’t necessarily support a claim about happiness, as these issues intersect with broader social and economic factors. The articles seem to suggest that single people might enjoy certain freedoms or more personal time, but that doesn't directly translate to higher happiness levels.

---

This is a very strong factcheck because you explained why the original claim was bad and how it was. There's an explanation that the original claim subjective because its an opinion based claim. You can find evidence for either sides of the argument so there is not one true answer and its hard to find concrete answer. You sourced 2 websites that seems to be good.

---

I agree that the fact that single people are happier is up to an opinion; I like how you give evidence on why the article is too subjective.

---

This is a really good fact check! Mentioning this claim is subjective from person to person is critical in understanding the difference between opinion and fact, which you explained really well. It seemed like you really understood what the article they linked was talking about because you mentioned their resources did not align with the claim (being about divorce rates and not dating). I would, however, have liked to see some validation of the sources you provided at the end and why you chose to link them. Having explained those articles would also have provided an outside source to fact check their overall claim. Overall, however, this was a good fact check.

---

I fully agree with this factcheck. This is 100% a subjective claim as this can differ from person to person. Some people are just genuinely happier single and others who are in healthy committed relationships may be happier that way. In addition I think that this article is two one sided in the sense it focuses the most on why single people are happier rather than trying to argue both sides. This article does nothing to prove that single people are inherently happier.

---

I agree that this claim is way too subjective to be considered true, as it depends on the person, and happiness is a very complicated and difficult thing to measure.

---

This is a solid fact-check because you clearly explained why the original claim is problematic and how it falls short. You pointed out that the claim is subjective, as it’s opinion-based, making it possible to find evidence supporting either side of the argument. This highlights the difficulty in reaching a definitive conclusion. Additionally, you cited two reliable websites, which strengthens your analysis.

---

I really like this analysis and believe this is a very good fact check because it addresses both sides of the equation, defining the issues as subjective. Everyone has a different experience being single and different goals in life, showing how people might be happier in both situations.

---

You made an important point about the subjectivity of the claim that "single people are happier." Happiness definitely is a personal experience that varies from person to person and the article doesn't address the variety. I appreciate how you addressed both sides of the claim and represented how different people are happier in both situations.

---

This is a great answer to the claim. One thing to commend about this answer is that there are multiple pieces of evidence with multiple sources. Another strength of this answer is that it is succinct and brief but at the same time addresses the claims made in this answer. One thing that could use work is simply just restructuring the answer to be more connected.

---

you did a good job at examining the article and explaining how it is subjective, and how the data they used doesn't align with the original claim

Answer 2

I think this article focuses too much on why single people are happy but doesn't really give any information to compare to the happiness of people in a relationship. Additionally, may be too subjective to make a claim.

Comments

I like how you mentioned that there is truth to their claim about people who are single being happy but also mentioned that there is no real evidence saying that people who are in relationships are unhappy.

---

I think this is a great comparison because there should be a comparison to people who are in a relationship and the happiness they get from that as well.

---

I agree that there are other kinds of factors that influence the degree of happiness. It need more evidences or papers to prove the idea that people who are single are happier.

---

i agree because i think there needs to be a study of the happiness of people in relationships vs single people.

---

I agree with this claim. It's important to bring in multiple perspectives when claiming something to be true. I'd agree this topic is a little too subjective. I would love to see data comparing people in a relationship to people who are not.

Answer 3

The relationship between happiness and relationship status is influenced by too many factors to be 100% true or false. Some people thrive in relationships, while others feel more fulfilled on their own.

Comments

I agree with you, there are too many personal factors in relationships and happiness. This makes it way too difficult to make a claim for the entire population about happiness based off of relationship status.

---

This is very true because the article is very opinionated based so one person's experience won't be the next person's. It can all vary on what was going on between them vs. when they were/are single. As humans whether we like to admit it or not, we need that romantic aspect in our lives. In one shape or another.

---

I think this is true because one's relationship status cannot determine happiness. It all depends on your own personal experience with a partner and there are so many different factors that go into it for each person.

---

Though I agree with your point, your claim would be made much more reliable if you could find some sort of source to confirm your stance. Even a quote from a relationship therapist (of some sort) supporting your opinion would be sufficient. And, if you found evidence against your claim, then, perhaps, your perspective on this topic might change in light of a different scholarly outlook. In short, though I agree with your statement (at first glance), your factcheck is simply an opinion and requires some sort of evidence to establish any sort of credibility.

---

I agree with what you are saying, this a difficult one to fact check as it all goes with personal expierence, I think it could be helpful to find someway to back up your claim or you are also just stating your own opinion online with no sources.

---

i think this is true. just like many people thrive in social situations, and others don't, relationships are for some people, but not all. i do however, believe that this is opinion based and it would help your claim to have evidence or an article.

---

Agree completely, relationships are too subjective to make a claim like this. The article seems to be more an opinion piece than a legitimate scientific claim. However I would recommend citing a source you used.

Answer 4

This article addresses a subject that is hard to prove statistically and one that varies greatly from person to person. The main claim of the article though, is that people CAN be happier when single, but there isn't necessarily a cause and effect relationship between the two. 

This article originates from Buzzfeed, which is a source that thrives off of sensational headlines and opinions. Often times while they can be interesting, Buzzfeed isn't a great source for trustworthy reporting. Focusing on specifically the author, she has written a book as well as hosted a podcast. She has experience with the topic as she has been single for a long time. This can be both good and bad for validity as she has firsthand experience with the topic and can speak from that experience, but it also leads to a lot of bias on the topic and possible exaggeration or withholding of information on the topic. 

I was looking at other articles covering the same topic, and came across this one. The article is slightly different, as it focuses on the reverse claim, that single people are less happy than people in a relationship. The article sources research data showing that people who are single are unhappier. But the article also focuses on a more important claim: "those who dismissed relationships as unimportant were more satisfied with their lives than single young adults who were less dismissive of romantic relationships."

The ultimate point of this article is that the happiness of people based on relationship isn't necessarily a result of being in a relationship, but more the mindset and views of people regarding desire for a relationship. Ultimately, this is a really cloudy topic with no definite answer based purely on the happiness of anybody who is single. The true determining factor of relationship based happiness is more what you make of being in a relationship rather than whether or not you are in one. 

Comments

I like the fact that you point out that BuzzFeed "thrives off of sensational headlines and opinions." This is super important to recognize as, yes, many people are picking up that the claim of this article can not be true, and this is one of the main reasons why. They aren't making a claim; they are trying to grab your attention with an in-your-face headline that will get you to click on the article.

---

I agree with you that the factor of influence degree of happies is different for each one. It depend on the personal value and experience. The situation of being single may be one kinds of factor but the it may influence less, which other kinds of factors can cover the factor of single.

---

Good critique of the article and its potential bias! I really like how you pointed out Buzzfeed's tendency for sensationalism and its credibility. What you said on mindset being the real factor for happiness is really interesting and I think this would be even better if you looked at studies on attachment styles among diferent people and how they do influence happiness.

---

I appreciated reading this fact check because it examines the claim without providing a definitive answer about whether single people are "happier" than those in relationships. Instead, it acknowledges that the answer depends on each individual's personal experience. I also liked how you used reliable sources to support your points, making your response clear and easy to follow.

---

This is a great fact-check!! Your thought process is super insightful and thorough. There are many factors to this claim that can be hard to address and you did that super well! You also brought in another source that had a new perspective to consider. The source was also reliable and a good resource for this topic.

Answer 5

I think there is some truth to this claim in the sense that as a single person you are less limited by a spouse and thus have less responsibilities, don't have to make time for a relationship, and certainly when it comes to dating there is a lot of money to be saved. This may set you up for a more self-fulfilling life but I would argue that for many if not most people it's within our human nature to want to have a spouse and share life's greatest memories, challenges, burdens, and victories with someone else. These are all things that would give great meaning to life and cause abundant happiness and joy, even in the midst of trial. It is even evidenced in scripture that relationships are a good thing, a gift from God and meant to fulfill us and give us happiness, "Then the Lord God said, “It is not good that the man should be alone; I will make him a helper fit for him.” This is of course in reference to the creation of Eve in Genesis 2:18(ESV).(https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Genesis%202%3A18&version=ESV) 

 It is interesting the statistics we are seeing today with a general rise in loneliness in society, lots of the research is linked to friendships but there has also been great connection to fewer marriages in our day and age. I believe that people who are in a healthy relationship are much more likely to be happy and avoid loneliness far more often. According to the American Psychiatric Association stating, "...with 30% of Americans aged 18-34 saying they were lonely every day or several times a week, and single adults are nearly twice as likely as married adults to say they have been lonely on a weekly basis over the past year (39% vs. 22%)." This statistic is highly alarming as it represents a nearly 2x increase in loneliness in those who are single. I believe that loneliness would be a huge roadblock to anyone trying to live a happy life. (https://www.psychiatry.org/news-room/news-releases/new-apa-poll-one-in-three-americans-feels-lonely-e#:~:text=Younger%20people%20were%20more%20likely,22%25).)

Comments

This factcheck is strong! It's a good start to have 2 articles that potentially target this fact in a different approach. While relationships in general are very personable and subject to the person in the relationship, that leads to various factors such as the ones you mentioned in the first sentence. I find it interesting that one of the sources take a biblical take on this since in those relationships were encouraged for happiness and evolution. I like that you did follow up with a statistic and the source that deals directly with people in my age range as well as a vast amount of people. Great job, unique take!

Answer 6

This statement can be looked at through the eyes of a person who is single and someone who is in a relationship. The author who wrote this article is credible, Katie Camero, a health and wellness journalist https://www.usatoday.com/staff/8433499001/katie-camero (about her). It doesn't give enough information about people currently in a relationship or married couples. This specific article gives an intro to this idea, but not solid overall evidence. There are more articles that can show this with studies behind them with different perspectives. An example is https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/happy-together/202402/are-single-or-partnered-young-adults-happier it gives backing evidence and surveyed different people not just people who are single. 

Comments

I appreciate your use of multiple sources, and your perspective on the multiple perspectives that this claim can be seen from. Your use of Psychology Today as a source improves a lot upon the claim's original source which is a buzzfeed article. This claim is subjective and you did a great job showing that.

Answer 7

The subject this article is trying to prove is too broad and there are many influencing factors to create an accurate statistic or evidence to support the claim. I am not sure BuzzFeed is the most accurate news source. The evidence they do provide does not prove much since the claim is too broad to be able to prove. Here is a study I found better explaining the claim of the BuzzFeed article. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/02654075221122887

Comments

This is a great fact-check, and I appreciate how effectively you identified that the subject is too broad. It's also important that you expressed your uncertainty about the reliability of the BuzzFeed article. I would agree that BuzzFeed is not the most reliable source. To further strengthen your point about its credibility, it might be helpful to research and include additional reliable sources or explain more specifically why BuzzFeed's credibility might be lacking.

---

This was a good fact check overall! Although I agree that the article in question is too broad and there are too many factors to create a true cause and effect case, I think to benefit the fact check it would have been helpful to provide examples of where in the text this unclarity was spotted. Although to explain a bit more about the article you found, as opposed to only adding the link, could also help to build a stronger argument. Overall though, this was a good fact check.

Answer 8

I think this article does a really good job of showing you examples of people who are happy AND singe, but does not do a lot of work in proving that the two are at all related to each other. This article had no experiment or study that scientifically searched for a genuine answer to this question which is why I think it did not prove its point. I would also not consider buzzfeed to be the most credible source of information.

Comments

I think this fact-check does an excellent job of sharing a logical opinion on both the issue and the source. However, I fail to see any of your own sources. IT would be nice to see a source that you provided so that we could get a credible alternative.

---

Thank you for pointing out the noncredible use of BuzzFeed as the only provided source. I completely agree with your statement that this is an extremely subjective subject with no concrete way to judge happiness levels in or out of a relationship. In fact, the exact opposite can be argued as well. Although I do not believe that it is as black and white as people in relationships are happy and single people are not, I would like to provide the counter argument with this source. I believe that not every case is the same and happiness applied to relationship status is very abstract and ever-changing.
https://www.cnn.com/2024/02/09/health/marriage-happiness-wellness/index.html#:~:text=Over%20the%20survey%20period%2C%20married,year%2C%20according%20to%20the%20data.

---

i think this is a good factcheck, but it would be nice to see some sources of your own to make the factcheck more accurate and reliable, to further prove your point that the article isn't credible.

Answer 9

According to Psychology Today, It is all up to personal interpretation of a relationship. If one perceives a relationship as important, they will most likely be more miserable if they are not coupled up,"They also found that those who dismissed relationships as unimportant were more satisfied with their lives than single young adults who were less dismissive of romantic relationships" was stated in the article, "Are Single or Partnered People Happier?"

Comments

The article that you referenced was written by credible authors, but I would love to see more information from a study done specifically on this issue. The article that you used mentions a study done on the topic, and you could've used more of that to back up your factcheck.

---

I think that it is difficult to quantify happiness, but the article you linked explicitly describes a study done to back the original claim and I think that Psychology Today is a credible source. A secondary study that agrees with the claim may also be helpful but regardless it is hard to accurately reach a conclusion that addresses the claim in a binary manner.

Answer 10

Buzzfeed news claims that people who are single are happier and live more authentic lives. Personally, I am skeptical of this claim right off the bat just because I feel like relationships are personal and this is a broad statement. Even with the statistics I feel like that topic is very opinion based and can be biased based off each individuals experience. When looking this statement up no other news sources credit it and buzzfeed technically is not a reliable news source to begin with. The title on this factcheck is slightly different from the articles title and has just a brief explanation of what is written so there is very minor details. Overall, I personally think this is biased and needs more evidence to back it up. 

Comments

Your approach to this fact check was good. By questioning the source, looking for other evidence, and pointing out potential bias, you showed great critical thinking in your fact-check process.